1 |
<wabenbau@×××××.com> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> <wabenbau@×××××.com> writes: |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> > lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
8 |
>> > |
9 |
>> >> Hi, |
10 |
>> >> |
11 |
>> >> I'm getting a black screen during booting, with the last message I |
12 |
>> >> can see being that udevevents are being processed. |
13 |
>> >> |
14 |
>> >> This happens with an NVIDIA GTX770 connected to a 4k display via a |
15 |
>> >> display port cable, and only when the monitor is configured to use |
16 |
>> >> display port 1.2 rather than 1.1. With 1.1, I can get only 30Hz |
17 |
>> >> refresh rate, so I want to use 1.2, which should allow 60. |
18 |
>> >> |
19 |
>> >> Installed are nvidia-drivers 343.36. |
20 |
>> >> |
21 |
>> >> Do I need a very special display port cable for this, or what might |
22 |
>> >> the issue? Both the graphics card and the monitor should be able |
23 |
>> >> to do the full resolution at 60Hz just fine. |
24 |
>> > |
25 |
>> > You need a DP cable that is able to handle a resolution of 4k@60Hz. |
26 |
>> > Not all DP cables can do this. |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> Hm, I bought this cable today, so I'd think it should be ok --- but I |
29 |
>> didn't explicitly specify that it must be one that does 4k@60. I |
30 |
>> didn't know I might have to. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> Is there any way to tell? The sticker on the package only says DP/DP |
33 |
>> 2.0m. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> It should be certified to DP 1.1a at least. |
36 |
> |
37 |
> Excerpt from |
38 |
> |
39 |
> https://web.archive.org/web/20140327103747/http://www.displayport.org/faq/ |
40 |
> |
41 |
> ---- |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Q: Where can I buy a DP 1.2 cable? Most of the cables are certified to DP 1.1a. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> A: The DisplayPort version 1.2 standard was designed to utilize the |
46 |
> Standard Display cable. We did this intentionally to avoid customer |
47 |
> confusion. A DisplayPort cable is a DisplayPort cable; EXCEPT if it a |
48 |
> “reduced bit rate” (or RBR) cable, which is typically a 15m cable |
49 |
> designed for projector applications, and they only support up to |
50 |
> 1080P; OR if it is an active cable, which will not support the new |
51 |
> HBR2 rate introduced in the DP 1.2 standard. |
52 |
> |
53 |
> So a cable that was tested to meet the DP 1.1a requirments also meets the DP 1.2 requirements. |
54 |
> |
55 |
> ---- |
56 |
> |
57 |
> But this is theory. I've made the experience that some cables doesn't |
58 |
> work with 4k@60Hz although they are so-called 1.1a/1.2 certified. I've |
59 |
> bought four faulty cables before I found the two that I'm using now. |
60 |
> One of the faulty cables doesn't work at all at full resolution, the |
61 |
> others are working but the picture had a lot of errors and was sometimes |
62 |
> black for some seconds. |
63 |
> |
64 |
> The two cables which I'm using now are a CROMO 41532 (2m length) and a |
65 |
> CROMO 41533 (3m length). |
66 |
> |
67 |
> Do you have the opportunity to test the cable with some other system, |
68 |
> e.g. some live system (knoppix?) or some windows system? I would do this |
69 |
> first before buying a new cable. |
70 |
|
71 |
Thank you very much for all the info! |
72 |
|
73 |
I finally got a cable that works. It's from Delock and says 82771 on |
74 |
the back of the package where the EAN code is. I like it, it seems to |
75 |
be good quality, and most importantly, it works. |
76 |
|
77 |
However, I can see the BIOS and the boot manager menu, then during |
78 |
booting, the screen goes black and the monitor says "no signal" |
79 |
(probably when the nvidia module is loaded). So I logged in blindly and |
80 |
started X11 and got a picture again. |
81 |
|
82 |
The monitor info says 4k@60Hz in the BIOS and when X11 is running. So |
83 |
there must be some setting which causes the graphics card to blank out |
84 |
on the console. |
85 |
|
86 |
Any idea what that could be? |
87 |
|
88 |
|
89 |
-- |
90 |
Again we must be afraid of speaking of daemons for fear that daemons |
91 |
might swallow us. Finally, this fear has become reasonable. |