1 |
lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> <wabenbau@×××××.com> writes: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> >> <wabenbau@×××××.com> writes: |
8 |
> >> |
9 |
> >> > lee <lee@××××××××.de> wrote: |
10 |
> >> > |
11 |
> >> >> Hi, |
12 |
> >> >> |
13 |
> >> >> I'm getting a black screen during booting, with the last |
14 |
> >> >> message I can see being that udevevents are being processed. |
15 |
> >> >> |
16 |
> >> >> This happens with an NVIDIA GTX770 connected to a 4k display |
17 |
> >> >> via a display port cable, and only when the monitor is |
18 |
> >> >> configured to use display port 1.2 rather than 1.1. With 1.1, |
19 |
> >> >> I can get only 30Hz refresh rate, so I want to use 1.2, which |
20 |
> >> >> should allow 60. |
21 |
> >> >> |
22 |
> >> >> Installed are nvidia-drivers 343.36. |
23 |
> >> >> |
24 |
> >> >> Do I need a very special display port cable for this, or what |
25 |
> >> >> might the issue? Both the graphics card and the monitor should |
26 |
> >> >> be able to do the full resolution at 60Hz just fine. |
27 |
> >> > |
28 |
> >> > You need a DP cable that is able to handle a resolution of |
29 |
> >> > 4k@60Hz. Not all DP cables can do this. |
30 |
> >> |
31 |
> >> Hm, I bought this cable today, so I'd think it should be ok --- |
32 |
> >> but I didn't explicitly specify that it must be one that does |
33 |
> >> 4k@60. I didn't know I might have to. |
34 |
> >> |
35 |
> >> Is there any way to tell? The sticker on the package only says |
36 |
> >> DP/DP 2.0m. |
37 |
> > |
38 |
> > It should be certified to DP 1.1a at least. |
39 |
> > |
40 |
> > Excerpt from |
41 |
> > |
42 |
> > https://web.archive.org/web/20140327103747/http://www.displayport.org/faq/ |
43 |
> > |
44 |
> > ---- |
45 |
> > |
46 |
> > Q: Where can I buy a DP 1.2 cable? Most of the cables are certified |
47 |
> > to DP 1.1a. |
48 |
> > |
49 |
> > A: The DisplayPort version 1.2 standard was designed to utilize the |
50 |
> > Standard Display cable. We did this intentionally to avoid customer |
51 |
> > confusion. A DisplayPort cable is a DisplayPort cable; EXCEPT if it |
52 |
> > a “reduced bit rate” (or RBR) cable, which is typically a 15m cable |
53 |
> > designed for projector applications, and they only support up to |
54 |
> > 1080P; OR if it is an active cable, which will not support the new |
55 |
> > HBR2 rate introduced in the DP 1.2 standard. |
56 |
> > |
57 |
> > So a cable that was tested to meet the DP 1.1a requirments also |
58 |
> > meets the DP 1.2 requirements. |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > ---- |
61 |
> > |
62 |
> > But this is theory. I've made the experience that some cables |
63 |
> > doesn't work with 4k@60Hz although they are so-called 1.1a/1.2 |
64 |
> > certified. I've bought four faulty cables before I found the two |
65 |
> > that I'm using now. One of the faulty cables doesn't work at all at |
66 |
> > full resolution, the others are working but the picture had a lot |
67 |
> > of errors and was sometimes black for some seconds. |
68 |
> > |
69 |
> > The two cables which I'm using now are a CROMO 41532 (2m length) |
70 |
> > and a CROMO 41533 (3m length). |
71 |
> > |
72 |
> > Do you have the opportunity to test the cable with some other |
73 |
> > system, e.g. some live system (knoppix?) or some windows system? I |
74 |
> > would do this first before buying a new cable. |
75 |
> |
76 |
> Thank you very much for all the info! |
77 |
> |
78 |
> I finally got a cable that works. It's from Delock and says 82771 on |
79 |
> the back of the package where the EAN code is. I like it, it seems to |
80 |
> be good quality, and most importantly, it works. |
81 |
|
82 |
Then you really had luck. I had two faulty cables from Delock and I |
83 |
decided not to buy a cable from Delock again. |
84 |
|
85 |
> However, I can see the BIOS and the boot manager menu, then during |
86 |
> booting, the screen goes black and the monitor says "no signal" |
87 |
> (probably when the nvidia module is loaded). So I logged in blindly |
88 |
> and started X11 and got a picture again. |
89 |
> |
90 |
> The monitor info says 4k@60Hz in the BIOS and when X11 is running. So |
91 |
> there must be some setting which causes the graphics card to blank out |
92 |
> on the console. |
93 |
> |
94 |
> Any idea what that could be? |
95 |
|
96 |
That's strange. I would understand a message like "Frequencies out of |
97 |
range" or something like that. But "No signal" indicates, that the |
98 |
monitor gets no signal at all. |
99 |
|
100 |
What happens when you switch from X to text console (Alt + Strg + F1)? |
101 |
|
102 |
-- |
103 |
Regards |
104 |
wabe |