| 1 |
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:22:25 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Ok, I don't think I really want to deal with baselayout 2 unless i |
| 4 |
> really have to, does anyone know what version of LVM is safe to regress |
| 5 |
> to so I can get access to data again? |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
You shouldn't need to change LVM versions, baselayout has nothing to do |
| 8 |
with actually accessing the LVM data, it simply uses a slightly different |
| 9 |
method of starting LVM. I last updated LVM two months ago but no changes |
| 10 |
were needed when switching to baselayout2 recently beyond the adding of |
| 11 |
the lvm init script to the boot runlevel, which the ebuild took care of. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
% genlop lvm2 |
| 14 |
* sys-fs/lvm2 |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
[snip] |
| 17 |
Thu Feb 7 19:58:40 2008 >>> sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.33 |
| 18 |
Thu Feb 14 08:40:32 2008 >>> sys-fs/lvm2-2.02.33-r1 |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
% genlop baselayout |
| 21 |
* sys-apps/baselayout |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
[snip] |
| 24 |
Thu Jan 17 16:57:44 2008 >>> sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.11.1 |
| 25 |
Mon Mar 31 09:18:36 2008 >>> sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.12 |
| 26 |
Wed Apr 16 22:17:52 2008 >>> sys-apps/baselayout-2.0.0 |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Stupidity is NOT a handicap. You'll have to park elsewhere. |
Archives