1 |
Georg Witwer wrote: |
2 |
> As you might have noticed or heard, cokehabit isn't part of the |
3 |
> Userreps project any longer. He and Userel obviously didn't get along |
4 |
> very well and there has been some troubles on IRC and on bugzilla, |
5 |
> which I didn't get a chance to see though. But I talked shortly with |
6 |
> cokehabit about it and he didn't object to leave the project, so we |
7 |
> have a vacant Userreps seat atm. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Since this is the first time that one of us left, we have to find a |
10 |
> rule on how we are to restaff that vacant seat. Impov, there are three |
11 |
> different options that we have. We could either go thru the whole |
12 |
> voting process again, which seem to be quite some work and would |
13 |
> definitely need some time or we could simply ask the ones that where |
14 |
> next on the list from the initial vote, to see if they are still |
15 |
> interested in doing the job or we let the appointed Userreps decide |
16 |
> who they want to have in their team to work with. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Even though the voting idea seems to be the logical thing to do, at |
19 |
> least to me when I thought about it first, it's the option I really |
20 |
> don't want to have and almost everyone from Userreps/Userrel agrees on |
21 |
> this point. It would just take to much time and effort, since we don't |
22 |
> want the mistakes of the first vote be repeated, like having better |
23 |
> announcements and getting the whole user community not just forum |
24 |
> peeps to vote. |
25 |
> |
26 |
> Picking the next one on the list that shows interest, is an option |
27 |
> that doesn't take much time and seems to be fair since they have |
28 |
> proven to have the support in the user community at the first vote. |
29 |
> |
30 |
> The third option is to let us Userreps pick someone we know and that |
31 |
> has shown interest in our project. And plainly spoken, this is the |
32 |
> option I favor the most, as does the rest of Userreps and Userrel. |
33 |
> Here is why: |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Building up a team with people that hardly know each other is not an |
36 |
> easy task. It took us quite some time to get to know each other and to |
37 |
> find a way to work somehow efficiently together. We are different to |
38 |
> any other project in Gentoo land because we did not pick our team by |
39 |
> ourself, but let others, you the user community, choose our team. |
40 |
> That's the way it has to be of course but it's a handicap, |
41 |
> nevertheless. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Since the whole project was started there has only been one user, who |
44 |
> also ran for Userreps btw, that followed our moves very closely. He |
45 |
> is in our channel (#gentoo-userreps) almost all the time, he takes |
46 |
> part in all our and userrel meetings, he is well known and respected |
47 |
> in the devs community, he made lots of useful suggestion and took the |
48 |
> time to write various concepts for his ideas, all of us Userreps value |
49 |
> him and his opinion quite high and we get along with him very well. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> After the 11th seat got vacant, there wasn't really any discussion |
52 |
> about it since it was obvious that we all wanted to have |
53 |
> [url=http://forums.gentoo.org/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=105924]djay[/url] |
54 |
> |
55 |
> (aka djay-il [irc] aka Alex Bogak [rl]) as our new team member. Most |
56 |
> of the devs believed that he was a Userrep anyways because he showed |
57 |
> up at all the meetings and actively took part in all the discussions. |
58 |
> :lol: And Userrel also seems to strongly agree with this idea. |
59 |
> |
60 |
> So I am here to ask your support to make djay our 11th member on the |
61 |
> next Userreps/Userrel meeting this Saturday. He knows his way around |
62 |
> and we know him quite well and he would fit just perfect in our team. |
63 |
> If you want us to move on, to do the things we were voted for as fast |
64 |
> as possible, please show us your support by dropping a few lines. If |
65 |
> you think that this is not ok, please drop us a few lines to explain |
66 |
> why. |
67 |
|
68 |
An idea "out of the box" style: |
69 |
Why not take that guy djay because he already acts like a part of the |
70 |
project anyway, the second from the previous voting because it's fast |
71 |
and logical, and a third one from a new voting because it would be fair? |
72 |
This way everyone would be happy. ;-) |
73 |
Yep, why restrict the project to only 11 members? |
74 |
|
75 |
-- |
76 |
Best regards, |
77 |
Daniel |
78 |
|
79 |
|
80 |
-- |
81 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |