1 |
As you might have noticed or heard, cokehabit isn't part of the |
2 |
Userreps project any longer. He and Userel obviously didn't get along |
3 |
very well and there has been some troubles on IRC and on bugzilla, |
4 |
which I didn't get a chance to see though. But I talked shortly with |
5 |
cokehabit about it and he didn't object to leave the project, so we |
6 |
have a vacant Userreps seat atm. |
7 |
|
8 |
Since this is the first time that one of us left, we have to find a |
9 |
rule on how we are to restaff that vacant seat. Impov, there are three |
10 |
different options that we have. We could either go thru the whole |
11 |
voting process again, which seem to be quite some work and would |
12 |
definitely need some time or we could simply ask the ones that where |
13 |
next on the list from the initial vote, to see if they are still |
14 |
interested in doing the job or we let the appointed Userreps decide |
15 |
who they want to have in their team to work with. |
16 |
|
17 |
Even though the voting idea seems to be the logical thing to do, at |
18 |
least to me when I thought about it first, it's the option I really |
19 |
don't want to have and almost everyone from Userreps/Userrel agrees on |
20 |
this point. It would just take to much time and effort, since we don't |
21 |
want the mistakes of the first vote be repeated, like having better |
22 |
announcements and getting the whole user community not just forum |
23 |
peeps to vote. |
24 |
|
25 |
Picking the next one on the list that shows interest, is an option |
26 |
that doesn't take much time and seems to be fair since they have |
27 |
proven to have the support in the user community at the first vote. |
28 |
|
29 |
The third option is to let us Userreps pick someone we know and that |
30 |
has shown interest in our project. And plainly spoken, this is the |
31 |
option I favor the most, as does the rest of Userreps and Userrel. |
32 |
Here is why: |
33 |
|
34 |
Building up a team with people that hardly know each other is not an |
35 |
easy task. It took us quite some time to get to know each other and to |
36 |
find a way to work somehow efficiently together. We are different to |
37 |
any other project in Gentoo land because we did not pick our team by |
38 |
ourself, but let others, you the user community, choose our team. |
39 |
That's the way it has to be of course but it's a handicap, |
40 |
nevertheless. |
41 |
|
42 |
Since the whole project was started there has only been one user, who |
43 |
also ran for Userreps btw, that followed our moves very closely. He |
44 |
is in our channel (#gentoo-userreps) almost all the time, he takes |
45 |
part in all our and userrel meetings, he is well known and respected |
46 |
in the devs community, he made lots of useful suggestion and took the |
47 |
time to write various concepts for his ideas, all of us Userreps value |
48 |
him and his opinion quite high and we get along with him very well. |
49 |
|
50 |
After the 11th seat got vacant, there wasn't really any discussion |
51 |
about it since it was obvious that we all wanted to have |
52 |
[url=http://forums.gentoo.org/profile.php?mode=viewprofile&u=105924]djay[/url] |
53 |
(aka djay-il [irc] aka Alex Bogak [rl]) as our new team member. Most |
54 |
of the devs believed that he was a Userrep anyways because he showed |
55 |
up at all the meetings and actively took part in all the discussions. |
56 |
:lol: And Userrel also seems to strongly agree with this idea. |
57 |
|
58 |
So I am here to ask your support to make djay our 11th member on the |
59 |
next Userreps/Userrel meeting this Saturday. He knows his way around |
60 |
and we know him quite well and he would fit just perfect in our team. |
61 |
If you want us to move on, to do the things we were voted for as fast |
62 |
as possible, please show us your support by dropping a few lines. If |
63 |
you think that this is not ok, please drop us a few lines to explain |
64 |
why. |
65 |
-- |
66 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |