1 |
On 22 Dec 2008, at 11:33, b.n. wrote: |
2 |
> Stroller ha scritto: |
3 |
>> I intended to stay silent, however I feel obliged to balance the |
4 |
>> posts |
5 |
>> from brullonulla@×××××.com |
6 |
> |
7 |
> You could answer to my emails, argumenting in detail. I hope we're not |
8 |
> here to "score points", but to understand what to do to solve the |
9 |
> situation. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> In my humble opinion, just mocking the guy and perpetuating the status |
12 |
> quo is not a solution, but hey, I could be wrong :) |
13 |
|
14 |
There's no point in me argumenting in detail, because it's all been |
15 |
said before. This is a storm in a teacup, and could easily have been |
16 |
avoided if the OP had only asked *politely* "what's all the fuss about |
17 |
HTML emails?" He could then have filed a bug about the missing |
18 |
netiquette sections of the list's welcome message and simply conducted |
19 |
himself without drawing unnecessary attention. As it is I find it |
20 |
difficult to put my finger on behaviour that would characterise the OP |
21 |
to me as "offensive", but I have found the "tone" of his emails to be |
22 |
persistently antagonising. |
23 |
|
24 |
I would never feel it appropriate to mock the afflicted, and only |
25 |
posted to reassert points that have already been made. I find it not |
26 |
in the least credible to suggest that the original mail was *really* |
27 |
ignored because of its formatting, and the OP is not *in the least* |
28 |
"right in demanding apologies". |
29 |
|
30 |
Mr Sebrecht's suggestion to use plain text was perfectly civil & |
31 |
courteous, and making one's debut in a community by inappropriately |
32 |
"demanding apologies" is certain to provoke negative responses. This |
33 |
thread was already *well* out of hand by the time we replied to it, |
34 |
and I see no need to further perpetuate it. |
35 |
|
36 |
Stroller. |