Archives
Archives
| From: | Grant Taylor <gtaylor@×××××××××××××××××××××.net> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is the best way forward? - Update 2 - SUCCESS! - CURRENT!!! | ||
| Date: | Tue, 09 Mar 2021 05:00:24 | ||
| Message-Id: | 195cb39d-27ff-6591-9d76-3fcbc330a78a@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is the best way forward? - Update 2 - SUCCESS! - CURRENT!!! by John Covici |
||
| 1 | On 3/8/21 7:30 PM, John Covici wrote: |
| 2 | > At least I didn't have to change profiles and gcc versions several |
| 3 | > times. |
| 4 | |
| 5 | I didn't /change/ the profile. As in it was 17.0 when I started and |
| 6 | still is 17.0. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | I did have to update the make.profile link to point to the same profile |
| 9 | in the alternate portage directory. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | This wouldn't have been an issue if I just re-used the same portage |
| 12 | directory. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | > I guess different situations require different methods. |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Indeed. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | |
| 19 | |
| 20 | -- |
| 21 | Grant. . . . |
| 22 | unix || die |