1 |
On 2/24/20 5:22 PM, james wrote: |
2 |
> On 2/24/20 4:30 PM, n952162 wrote: |
3 |
>> What do you mean with this? |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> On 2020-02-21 00:38, james wrote: |
6 |
>>> Now, I'm a 5G activist, so that telcos become merely non-exclusive |
7 |
>>> bandwidth providers and only the less informed use them for mobile |
8 |
>>> software stacks..... |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> I, like everybody else, am "less informed", but I'm informed enough to |
11 |
>> strongly doubt that the telcos will give up the grip that they have on |
12 |
>> the mobile market.� 3gpp is not Wikileaks.� It's a telco tool to make |
13 |
>> money (that's not a criticism.� The mobile industry put food on my |
14 |
>> table |
15 |
>> for decades).� I'm not on the 5G track, but as far as I understand, |
16 |
>> it's |
17 |
>> mostly just new Radio Access Network technology.� Does it have a |
18 |
>> different interface to the core (business systems)?� Not likely - |
19 |
>> that's |
20 |
>> been serving since G2. |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> |
23 |
> |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Exactly. The major telcos, like many other super corps, need to be |
26 |
> 'reigned in'. Many experts know this, they haven't a clue, nor the balls |
27 |
> to speak up. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> A myriad of linux technologies and efforts, from the people, can look |
30 |
> 'the beast' in the eyes and say NO. |
31 |
> ENOUGH. OR they can just lay down and prepare to be subsumed. I've made |
32 |
> my choice; but I'm old and ready to go. So what the hell do I have to |
33 |
> loose? |
34 |
> |
35 |
> |
36 |
> There is so much more, than the published standards on 5G, which are |
37 |
> still not finalized, than most comprehend. |
38 |
> I doubt 5G will ever have a finalized standard, not even in the USA. |
39 |
> Sure they may act like it is, but there are too many things afoot, for |
40 |
> it to become static. |
41 |
> |
42 |
> I cannot nor will not exactly finger specifics, as that could land me in |
43 |
> incarceration, where I'm not even allowed a lawyer. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> |
46 |
> What I am willing to speak up about, is GENTOO, needs a cellular |
47 |
> offering, imho. That way, movement from the cell to workstation to the |
48 |
> lappy-tablet and other devices, becomes the essence of security for the |
49 |
> individual. |
50 |
> |
51 |
> Just marinate of having 3 or more cellphone-stacks on a single phone so |
52 |
> you can boot (1s) into different distros. Or having 3 sockets with |
53 |
> different sim cards: |
54 |
> |
55 |
> https://www.lifewire.com/what-are-sim-cards-577532 |
56 |
> |
57 |
> Common man, the carriers are in charge of cellular security. Do you |
58 |
> think there is any real security on your or my cellphone? |
59 |
> |
60 |
> So what happens when ordinary folks, like comm_hackers, |
61 |
> have hundreds of sim cards. Swaping of sim_cards. The list goes on and |
62 |
> on and on. |
63 |
> |
64 |
> The real opportunity here, is that CONSTITUIONALLY, |
65 |
> law-abiding citizens have every right to privacy, which includes |
66 |
> personal ID security. One day, maybe soon, after 5G takes hold, a |
67 |
> class-action lawsuit, will find favor at the Supreme court. At the state |
68 |
> and regional level, not much hope. But the US supreme court has a |
69 |
> history of siding with citizens in such matters. The Supreme court is |
70 |
> very likely to become a stong activist, |
71 |
> due to the Trillions of dollars in fraud, and that fraud mostly damages |
72 |
> folks at the bottom of our society. |
73 |
> |
74 |
> Things like hospital and doctor groups, where you owe money of services, |
75 |
> you can never pay, are about to make the bottom half of US society, |
76 |
> permanent victims all via that vendor controlled cell phone. |
77 |
> |
78 |
> ENOUGH BULLSHIT!� Time to act, ymmv. |
79 |
> |
80 |
> Local lawenforcement can easily circumvent 'due process' via modern cell |
81 |
> phones. Many companies are doing just that, and selling illegal data, to |
82 |
> anyone with money. |
83 |
> |
84 |
> Shall I continue to elaborate? NO. Picture is more than adequately |
85 |
> framed, imho. |
86 |
> |
87 |
> Be Blessed, |
88 |
> James |
89 |
> |
90 |
> |
91 |
> |