Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

[Dale]

Kent Fredric wrote:
> On 6/9/07, Dale <dalek@××××××××××.net> wrote:
>>
>> Let me guess, Jakub closed it?  LOL
>>
>> Can I also assume he decided to stay?  I read he was leaving a while
>> back.
>>
>> Dale
>>
>> :-)  :-)  :-)
>
>
> Lemme be perfectly clear here. Jakub does a very good job of what he
> does, and gentoo IMO does suffer a bit when hes not here.  Bugs need
> wrangling, or the right devs dont get even told they're there, and
> Jakub does a legendary job of redirecting them to the right place.
> Its like having an email server with only one ingoing email address
> and having to get a human to redirect all the mails by hand to the
> right inboxes.
>
> He is like gentoo. Not perfect, but better than all the other choices :)
> Gentoo does tend to get a little pissy sometimes, but what can you
> expect  =)
>

Maybe I should clarify a bit.  The first part was a joke.  I have filed
bugs and I have never had one closed that I can recall.  I'm clueless
about that sort of thing and he still managed to figure mine out.  Not
sure how he did that though.  LOL

I subscribe to the dev list and I think that was where I read he was
leaving.  A LOT, I mean  LOT, of people asked him to stay.  I didn't but
I didn't want him to leave either.  Even if he had closed one of my
bugs, I still wouldn't.  I think replacing him with a bot thing was
going to cause a lot of trouble.  I read that was their plan at least.

So, I agree.  He does his job well in my opinion.  If I had a few extra
brain cells left, I would try to help.  Me being on dial-up and my
health making me unpredictable to say the least would make that pretty
much pointless.

Glad you stayed Jakub.  Hang in there.

Dale

:-)  :-)  :-)

-- 
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list