| 1 |
Am Donnerstag, 15. Dezember 2011, 18:29:14 schrieb Lavender: |
| 2 |
> At 2011-12-15 03:24:20,"Michael Schreckenbauer" <grimlog@×××.de> wrote: |
| 3 |
> >Am Mittwoch, 14. Dezember 2011, 14:22:47 schrieb Lavender: |
| 4 |
> >> Now I'm totally confused, I can't find helpful information from |
| 5 |
> >> Internet. I know mesa is a open source implementation of OpenGL, |
| 6 |
> >> obviously mesa will afford OpenGL API. DRI is short for Direct |
| 7 |
> >> Rendering |
| 8 |
> >> Infrastructure, I have chosen options like: |
| 9 |
> >> Device Drivers ---> |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> Graphics support ---> |
| 12 |
> >> <*> Direct Rendering Manager ---> |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> >this is DRM. This one manages allocation of memory for video devices. |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> >> <*> ATI Radeon |
| 17 |
> >> [*] Enable modesetting on radeon by default |
| 18 |
> >> |
| 19 |
> >> Does this mean that DRI libraries are built into kernel? |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> >No. |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> >> If not, who |
| 24 |
> >> contains DRI? Also who affords GLX libraries? Mesa or Xorg? |
| 25 |
> > |
| 26 |
> >DRI is part of mesa. Mesa also provides the GLX libraries. |
| 27 |
> > |
| 28 |
> >Best, |
| 29 |
> >Michael |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Thanks and I wish you could help answer this question.Now I know Mesa |
| 32 |
> provides DRI and GLX, when I installed xorg-server,there're also libraries |
| 33 |
> named like libdri.so and libglx.so in /etc/X11/....(somewhere). |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Yeah, I was wrong :) libglx and libdri are part of xorg-server. |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
Best, |
| 38 |
Michael |
Archives