| 1 |
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Peter Humphrey <peter@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Friday 31 October 2014 15:09:26 J. Roeleveld wrote: |
| 3 |
>> |
| 4 |
>> I've got a few systems where grub1 doesn't work. This is more likely caused |
| 5 |
>> by some changes in used filesystems instead of any other cause. |
| 6 |
>> If I really wanted to, I might get it to work, but I don't see the point in |
| 7 |
>> spending time on this. |
| 8 |
>> Grub starts the boot process and then, afaik, disappears. |
| 9 |
>> Which is sufficient for me. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> My grub-0.99 lets me choose from four kernels and two or three run levels at |
| 12 |
> boot time, and grub-2 can't handle this yet, or it couldn't the last time I |
| 13 |
> checked. I don't suggest that everyone has a similar need, but at least in |
| 14 |
> some cases the old grub does still have a place. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
You can edit "/etc/grub.d/10_linux" to add more than the regular and |
| 17 |
the recovery entries. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
You can also "chmod -x" the files in "/etc/grub.d/*" and create manual |
| 20 |
entries in 40_custom (and keep it executable!). |
Archives