| 1 |
Daniel da Veiga wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> Well, I'd expect to get something usable even with minimal flag. |
| 4 |
>> IMHO, mysqld *is* critical feature... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> No, you have the client and all libraries needed to access a remote |
| 7 |
> server, that is a VERY useful flag when you really don't need the |
| 8 |
> whole mysqld stuff and data, while still you want to access a remote |
| 9 |
> DB. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
But description says: |
| 12 |
mysql: A fast, multi-threaded, multi-user SQL database server. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
And that's what I'd expect, even with minimal use-flag: |
| 15 |
server, not client. And if "minimal" removes server |
| 16 |
functionality, than it does remove critical features |
| 17 |
(if you remove server-functionality, it is not server anymore). |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
All I want to say is that description (or implementation) |
| 20 |
of that "minimal" flag might be misleading... |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Jarry |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives