| 1 |
On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:10:46 -0700, Joseph wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> >Portage is excessively verbose in it's output. With -v it dumps all |
| 4 |
> >sorts of info to the console and it's incredibly hard to read. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> >It especially likes to print the full reasoning why it doesn't upgrade |
| 7 |
> >some package to latest due to a dependency requirement, and it's this |
| 8 |
> >that usually hides actual real problems in amongst all the noise. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> >The level of verbosity from portage over the past year really should |
| 11 |
> >only be shown with -vvv |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> Thank for the hint, never thought about it. I'll try next time "emerge |
| 14 |
> -uDNavvvq world |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Alan was saying that portage is already very verbose, you are better off |
| 17 |
running with no -v options. That way you only see true errors and serious |
| 18 |
warnings and not all the irrelevant stuff that just gets in the way. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> Yes, it was very hard to read and duped information |
| 21 |
> into the screen that wasn't relevant. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Exactly, cut down on the irrelevant information by not using -v. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Neil Bothwick |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Sisko:"I won't be condescending to you this episode, Dr. Bashir." |
Archives