1 |
On 02/07/15 19:53, Neil Bothwick wrote: |
2 |
>On Sat, 7 Feb 2015 09:10:46 -0700, Joseph wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> >Portage is excessively verbose in it's output. With -v it dumps all |
5 |
>> >sorts of info to the console and it's incredibly hard to read. |
6 |
>> > |
7 |
>> >It especially likes to print the full reasoning why it doesn't upgrade |
8 |
>> >some package to latest due to a dependency requirement, and it's this |
9 |
>> >that usually hides actual real problems in amongst all the noise. |
10 |
>> > |
11 |
>> >The level of verbosity from portage over the past year really should |
12 |
>> >only be shown with -vvv |
13 |
> |
14 |
>> Thank for the hint, never thought about it. I'll try next time "emerge |
15 |
>> -uDNavvvq world |
16 |
> |
17 |
>Alan was saying that portage is already very verbose, you are better off |
18 |
>running with no -v options. That way you only see true errors and serious |
19 |
>warnings and not all the irrelevant stuff that just gets in the way. |
20 |
> |
21 |
>> Yes, it was very hard to read and duped information |
22 |
>> into the screen that wasn't relevant. |
23 |
> |
24 |
>Exactly, cut down on the irrelevant information by not using -v. |
25 |
> |
26 |
>-- |
27 |
>Neil Bothwick |
28 |
> |
29 |
>Sisko:"I won't be condescending to you this episode, Dr. Bashir." |
30 |
|
31 |
Got it. |
32 |
I'll try it next time. When I upgrade and have to scroll via 200+ messages of emerge packages it is easy to not to notice about some critical information; in my |
33 |
case "grub" that was calling to run "grub-install" or the system will not boot. |
34 |
I wish the packages without any changes or warning wouldn't even show up after upgrade. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Joseph |