Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean wants to wipe out KDE3
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:18:55
Message-Id: 494F7789.3080309@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: depclean wants to wipe out KDE3 by Neil Bothwick
1 Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 03:57:22 +0200, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
3 >
4 >
5 >> And how is putting KDE4 in /usr/kde going to help in this? What
6 >> difference does it make if the wrong path is chosen? Surely, it
7 >> doesn't matter a bit how that path looks like if it's wrong. If a KDE4
8 >> path would come before a KDE3 path in a KDE3 session, the last thing
9 >> you care about is whether that path is /usr/bin or /usr/kde/4.1/bin.
10 >>
11 >
12 > Because /usr/bin will always be in your PATH, so even if you are running a
13 > KDE 3 session, KDE4 programs will be loaded. By keeping the separate,not
14 > only from one another but also from other programs, you can ensure that
15 > your PATH includes only KDE3 or KDE4 programs.
16 >
17 >
18 >
19
20 So to clarify a bit more, for me at least. If you login to KDE 3.5 then
21 /usr/kde/3.5/bin is in your path but not /usr/kde/kde/4.*. The same
22 could be said in the reverse I assume?
23
24 If you don't use the flag and login to KDE 3.5 then all the KDE 4.*
25 stuff is in your path and anytime you try to open a KDE 3.5 app, it sees
26 the KDE 4.* apps first? Correct? If it is, I can only imagine how
27 confused a computer would be.
28
29 I wonder if a person could change the order that those paths are
30 searched? Could you put in a config file somewhere to search one first
31 then the others or would that just not work well in the reverse situation?
32
33 I think I am out of cents again. o~o I'm starting to see why this is
34 so confusing to a computer now. Whew !
35
36 Dale
37
38 :-) :-)

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-user] Re: depclean wants to wipe out KDE3 Nikos Chantziaras <realnc@×××××.de>