Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: James <wireless@×××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: GSOC discussion
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 20:35:27
Message-Id: loom.20140109T211638-594@post.gmane.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] GSOC discussion by Mateusz Kowalczyk
1 Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu <at> fuuzetsu.co.uk> writes:
2
3 > On 07/01/14 14:35, Vladimir Romanov wrote:
4 > > Wow. Can i try to do this task (aside of GSOC, simply because it's
5 > > interesting)?
6
7 Well, it's just a "raw idea" that needs quite a bit of further thought.
8
9 Basically, you need a mentor and a project to work under GSOC-2014.
10 You might as well get paid for this effort, if that appeals to you.
11 If not, and you have time, you can develop something like this on your own.
12 Set simple goals and use a small testbed. Once you roll something out
13 a few times, invite others to test drive it. It probally lead
14 to google taking an interest in your work, if you spin some good
15 ideas into a usable codebase. It might also be appealing to reseach
16 what programming languages/databases would be good to use.
17
18 You could even further focus the effort not just gentoo-centric but
19 something like gentoo-centric-security....
20
21 Surely you can "take ownership" of the idea, recraft it, or
22 modify (fork) and applicable (?) existing code base as you like.
23 Who knows, search is a hot topic. You just might land a gig
24 at your own "startup" should the winds of favor drift your way.....
25
26
27
28 > Personally I think this project is a bit too convoluted, requires a
29 > lot of community effort and becomes fairly useless should people
30 > decide to stop contributing to it for some reason. I think the effort
31 > would be better spent updating the Wiki with the findings on the
32 > mailing lists. Google is Good Enough™ with finding the information you
33 > need. It does tend to take some time but I don't think it's so much
34 > that it justifies the amount of effort that'd have to go into the
35 > project.
36
37 I disagree with you. Nobody has to be forced to use it. The heart of the
38 idea is that some (more experience users) form better (google) search
39 syntax than others, particularly when looking deeply into searching
40 for relevant material. Often one does not need a fully, concise, current
41 web page on exactly what they are seeking. It is only after hours and hours
42 of refined searches that folks sometimes find key pieces of information
43 via search engines. Besides, google is full of "noise" even with keenly,
44 well formed searches, as we all know. Furthermore, the time has come
45 form users to be "more in control" of their own searches, as google
46 seeks to satisfy too many masters, imho.
47
48 It is merely and idea to leverage the expertise of some folk in deep
49 searches, who wish to share their their search (kunfu) with others,
50 via this project idea. Those experts would merely have to use the "frontend"
51 to search for things, allowing the frontend to do it's
52 work transparently. If you are search for someting sensitive, then just
53 do not use the frontend.
54
55 I do agree with you about the need to work on the gentoo-wiki, as I myself
56 have a few project in that vain, in early stages.....
57
58
59 But a frontend-tool/app to make our collective gentoo searches, more
60 energized, is an interesting, entrepreneurial idea, methinks.... ymmv.