1 |
Mateusz Kowalczyk <fuuzetsu <at> fuuzetsu.co.uk> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 07/01/14 14:35, Vladimir Romanov wrote: |
4 |
> > Wow. Can i try to do this task (aside of GSOC, simply because it's |
5 |
> > interesting)? |
6 |
|
7 |
Well, it's just a "raw idea" that needs quite a bit of further thought. |
8 |
|
9 |
Basically, you need a mentor and a project to work under GSOC-2014. |
10 |
You might as well get paid for this effort, if that appeals to you. |
11 |
If not, and you have time, you can develop something like this on your own. |
12 |
Set simple goals and use a small testbed. Once you roll something out |
13 |
a few times, invite others to test drive it. It probally lead |
14 |
to google taking an interest in your work, if you spin some good |
15 |
ideas into a usable codebase. It might also be appealing to reseach |
16 |
what programming languages/databases would be good to use. |
17 |
|
18 |
You could even further focus the effort not just gentoo-centric but |
19 |
something like gentoo-centric-security.... |
20 |
|
21 |
Surely you can "take ownership" of the idea, recraft it, or |
22 |
modify (fork) and applicable (?) existing code base as you like. |
23 |
Who knows, search is a hot topic. You just might land a gig |
24 |
at your own "startup" should the winds of favor drift your way..... |
25 |
|
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
> Personally I think this project is a bit too convoluted, requires a |
29 |
> lot of community effort and becomes fairly useless should people |
30 |
> decide to stop contributing to it for some reason. I think the effort |
31 |
> would be better spent updating the Wiki with the findings on the |
32 |
> mailing lists. Google is Good Enough™ with finding the information you |
33 |
> need. It does tend to take some time but I don't think it's so much |
34 |
> that it justifies the amount of effort that'd have to go into the |
35 |
> project. |
36 |
|
37 |
I disagree with you. Nobody has to be forced to use it. The heart of the |
38 |
idea is that some (more experience users) form better (google) search |
39 |
syntax than others, particularly when looking deeply into searching |
40 |
for relevant material. Often one does not need a fully, concise, current |
41 |
web page on exactly what they are seeking. It is only after hours and hours |
42 |
of refined searches that folks sometimes find key pieces of information |
43 |
via search engines. Besides, google is full of "noise" even with keenly, |
44 |
well formed searches, as we all know. Furthermore, the time has come |
45 |
form users to be "more in control" of their own searches, as google |
46 |
seeks to satisfy too many masters, imho. |
47 |
|
48 |
It is merely and idea to leverage the expertise of some folk in deep |
49 |
searches, who wish to share their their search (kunfu) with others, |
50 |
via this project idea. Those experts would merely have to use the "frontend" |
51 |
to search for things, allowing the frontend to do it's |
52 |
work transparently. If you are search for someting sensitive, then just |
53 |
do not use the frontend. |
54 |
|
55 |
I do agree with you about the need to work on the gentoo-wiki, as I myself |
56 |
have a few project in that vain, in early stages..... |
57 |
|
58 |
|
59 |
But a frontend-tool/app to make our collective gentoo searches, more |
60 |
energized, is an interesting, entrepreneurial idea, methinks.... ymmv. |