1 |
Holly Bostick wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
>But am I supposed to have both folders? Shouldn't one of them (the old |
4 |
>one) have been deleted when the previous versions of Firefox (and |
5 |
>Thunderbird) were removed? Or are they still used for some reason (and |
6 |
>if so, then why do I have to have a new folder)? |
7 |
> |
8 |
>Seems to me that something's a bit wonky somewhere, but thought I'd |
9 |
>check here to see if |
10 |
> |
11 |
>1) anybody else is seeing this |
12 |
> |
13 |
>2) anybody knows a reason this configuration makes sense/is valid |
14 |
> |
15 |
>before posting a bug. |
16 |
> |
17 |
> |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
I saw the same thing. I think the old folders would have been deleted |
21 |
by portage, except that some plugins (like flash and realplayer) |
22 |
installed symlinks into those directories, which prevented portage from |
23 |
removing them just because firefox/thunderbird was updated. |
24 |
|
25 |
I just rm -rf'd the directories...but a better plan would have been to: |
26 |
|
27 |
equery belongs `find /usr/lib/MozillaFirefox -type f` |
28 |
|
29 |
and the same thing for Thunderbird. After remerging all resulting |
30 |
packages, there should be basically nothing left in either of the old |
31 |
directories. |
32 |
|
33 |
-Richard |
34 |
|
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |