1 |
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 3:07 AM, Samuli Suominen <ssuominen@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On 05/06/14 02:25, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
4 |
>> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Dutch Ingraham <stoa@×××.us> wrote: |
5 |
>>> On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
6 |
>>>> On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote: |
7 |
>>>>> On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote: |
8 |
>>>>>> Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen: |
9 |
>>>>>>> On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote: |
10 |
>>>>>>>> No, "sys-fs/udev" is not masked, but an update is indicated in the |
11 |
>>>>>>>> emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff is from the overlay. |
12 |
>>>>>>>> Unfortunately, the xfce stuff is not, so even if the overlay currency |
13 |
>>>>>>>> was an issue, I'll still be showing some dependencies. |
14 |
>>>>>>>> |
15 |
>>>>>>> Try re-emerging on un-emerging the offending packages, like |
16 |
>>>>>>> xfce4-session and xfce4-power-manager, |
17 |
>>>>>>> it has helped some people, to refresh the .ebuild copy that is installed |
18 |
>>>>>>> with the .ebuild copy from |
19 |
>>>>>>> Portage |
20 |
>>>>>>> |
21 |
>>>>>>> - Samuli |
22 |
>>>>>>> |
23 |
>>>>>> Thanks - that fixed it for me: |
24 |
>>>>>> |
25 |
>>>>>> # emerge -C xfce-base/xfce4-session xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager |
26 |
>>>>>> xfce-extra/xfce4-systemload-plugin |
27 |
>>>>>> # emerge -uND xfce-base/xfce4-meta xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager |
28 |
>>>>>> xfce-extra/xfce4-systemload-plugin |
29 |
>>>>>> |
30 |
>>>>>> |
31 |
>>>>>> Greetings |
32 |
>>>>>> Daniel |
33 |
>>>>>> |
34 |
>>>>> Unfortunately, this doesn't work for me. So let me re-cap: I have |
35 |
>>>>> |
36 |
>>>>> 4. masked virtual/udev-208-r2; that has not worked. |
37 |
>>>> First, remove that mask. Masking it will certainly cause more blockers, |
38 |
>>>> than solve them. |
39 |
>>>> |
40 |
>>>>> [ebuild N ~] mate-extra/mate-power-manager-1.6.3::mate-overlay |
41 |
>>>>> USE="applet policykit -gnome-keyring -man {-test}" 0 kB |
42 |
>>>>> [ebuild N ~] mate-base/mate-session-manager-1.6.1-r1::mate-overlay |
43 |
>>>>> USE="ipv6 -debug -systemd" 0 kB |
44 |
>>>>> |
45 |
>>>> see "::mate-overlay", it's presumably broken or outdated. stop using the |
46 |
>>>> overlay and use MATE from Portage instead. |
47 |
>>>> or you can mask the packages from overlay, the syntax is like: |
48 |
>>>> |
49 |
>>>> /etc/portage/package.mask |
50 |
>>>> |
51 |
>>>> mate-extra/mate-power-manager::mate-overlay |
52 |
>>>> mate-base/mate-session-manager::mate-overlay |
53 |
>>>> |
54 |
>>>> - Samuli |
55 |
>>>> |
56 |
>>>> |
57 |
>>> Thanks everybody for your help. I've made the further suggested |
58 |
>>> changes, but I remain with the three hard blocks. |
59 |
>>> |
60 |
>>> I've now spent about 7 hours over the last two days on this issue (about |
61 |
>>> 2x the fresh install time), when all I wanted to do was a routine |
62 |
>>> update. I've reworked a large part of my system, adding a new |
63 |
>>> package.mask file and populating it with six packages. |
64 |
>>> |
65 |
>>> I suppose its now time for an uninstall. Kind of disappointing; we are |
66 |
>>> told Gentoo is about choices, and in fact that's true. I made the |
67 |
>>> choice to use a pure openRC system. The last 7 hours of free time, |
68 |
>>> though, was spent trying, and ultimately failing, to correct a problem |
69 |
>>> not chosen, not wanted, and not invited. |
70 |
>>> |
71 |
>>> The sine qua non is unarguably systemd. Even though my choice was to |
72 |
>>> not deploy it, apparently it takes a significant time commitment and/or |
73 |
>>> developer-level knowledge to choose to not use it. Quite the inelegant |
74 |
>>> end to my once-trusty OS. |
75 |
>>> |
76 |
>> You are right, all I can say is that I am sorry we treat users like |
77 |
>> that. We forget that our task is to ease deployment of upstream |
78 |
>> projects to end users. What we experience is only the start of the |
79 |
>> mess of having two separate contradictory layouts within stable tree, |
80 |
>> without decent profile setups to protect users from pulling layout |
81 |
>> they are not interested in. |
82 |
>> |
83 |
>> |
84 |
> |
85 |
> We? The ::mate-overlay maintainers? You are involved in the |
86 |
> ::mate-overlay development then? |
87 |
> |
88 |
|
89 |
This effected stable tree of Gentoo as well, pulling undesired |
90 |
different layout into stable is something that should have been |
91 |
avoided. It is about time we split the profiles, systemd is not option |
92 |
for people who runs openrc. |