1 |
On 05/06/14 02:25, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:15 AM, Dutch Ingraham <stoa@×××.us> wrote: |
3 |
>> On 06/04/2014 03:17 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote: |
4 |
>>> On 04/06/14 20:11, Dutch Ingraham wrote: |
5 |
>>>> On 06/04/2014 07:22 AM, Daniel Troeder wrote: |
6 |
>>>>> Am 04.06.2014 06:05, schrieb Samuli Suominen: |
7 |
>>>>>> On 04/06/14 05:17, Dutch Ingraham wrote: |
8 |
>>>>>>> No, "sys-fs/udev" is not masked, but an update is indicated in the |
9 |
>>>>>>> emerge above. That's a good catch, the MATE stuff is from the overlay. |
10 |
>>>>>>> Unfortunately, the xfce stuff is not, so even if the overlay currency |
11 |
>>>>>>> was an issue, I'll still be showing some dependencies. |
12 |
>>>>>>> |
13 |
>>>>>> Try re-emerging on un-emerging the offending packages, like |
14 |
>>>>>> xfce4-session and xfce4-power-manager, |
15 |
>>>>>> it has helped some people, to refresh the .ebuild copy that is installed |
16 |
>>>>>> with the .ebuild copy from |
17 |
>>>>>> Portage |
18 |
>>>>>> |
19 |
>>>>>> - Samuli |
20 |
>>>>>> |
21 |
>>>>> Thanks - that fixed it for me: |
22 |
>>>>> |
23 |
>>>>> # emerge -C xfce-base/xfce4-session xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager |
24 |
>>>>> xfce-extra/xfce4-systemload-plugin |
25 |
>>>>> # emerge -uND xfce-base/xfce4-meta xfce-extra/xfce4-power-manager |
26 |
>>>>> xfce-extra/xfce4-systemload-plugin |
27 |
>>>>> |
28 |
>>>>> |
29 |
>>>>> Greetings |
30 |
>>>>> Daniel |
31 |
>>>>> |
32 |
>>>> Unfortunately, this doesn't work for me. So let me re-cap: I have |
33 |
>>>> |
34 |
>>>> 4. masked virtual/udev-208-r2; that has not worked. |
35 |
>>> First, remove that mask. Masking it will certainly cause more blockers, |
36 |
>>> than solve them. |
37 |
>>> |
38 |
>>>> [ebuild N ~] mate-extra/mate-power-manager-1.6.3::mate-overlay |
39 |
>>>> USE="applet policykit -gnome-keyring -man {-test}" 0 kB |
40 |
>>>> [ebuild N ~] mate-base/mate-session-manager-1.6.1-r1::mate-overlay |
41 |
>>>> USE="ipv6 -debug -systemd" 0 kB |
42 |
>>>> |
43 |
>>> see "::mate-overlay", it's presumably broken or outdated. stop using the |
44 |
>>> overlay and use MATE from Portage instead. |
45 |
>>> or you can mask the packages from overlay, the syntax is like: |
46 |
>>> |
47 |
>>> /etc/portage/package.mask |
48 |
>>> |
49 |
>>> mate-extra/mate-power-manager::mate-overlay |
50 |
>>> mate-base/mate-session-manager::mate-overlay |
51 |
>>> |
52 |
>>> - Samuli |
53 |
>>> |
54 |
>>> |
55 |
>> Thanks everybody for your help. I've made the further suggested |
56 |
>> changes, but I remain with the three hard blocks. |
57 |
>> |
58 |
>> I've now spent about 7 hours over the last two days on this issue (about |
59 |
>> 2x the fresh install time), when all I wanted to do was a routine |
60 |
>> update. I've reworked a large part of my system, adding a new |
61 |
>> package.mask file and populating it with six packages. |
62 |
>> |
63 |
>> I suppose its now time for an uninstall. Kind of disappointing; we are |
64 |
>> told Gentoo is about choices, and in fact that's true. I made the |
65 |
>> choice to use a pure openRC system. The last 7 hours of free time, |
66 |
>> though, was spent trying, and ultimately failing, to correct a problem |
67 |
>> not chosen, not wanted, and not invited. |
68 |
>> |
69 |
>> The sine qua non is unarguably systemd. Even though my choice was to |
70 |
>> not deploy it, apparently it takes a significant time commitment and/or |
71 |
>> developer-level knowledge to choose to not use it. Quite the inelegant |
72 |
>> end to my once-trusty OS. |
73 |
>> |
74 |
> You are right, all I can say is that I am sorry we treat users like |
75 |
> that. We forget that our task is to ease deployment of upstream |
76 |
> projects to end users. What we experience is only the start of the |
77 |
> mess of having two separate contradictory layouts within stable tree, |
78 |
> without decent profile setups to protect users from pulling layout |
79 |
> they are not interested in. |
80 |
> |
81 |
> |
82 |
|
83 |
We? The ::mate-overlay maintainers? You are involved in the |
84 |
::mate-overlay development then? |