Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 07:28:08
Message-Id: 20180618082750.02eb07a9@digimed.co.uk
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior by Ian Zimmerman
1 On Sun, 17 Jun 2018 19:35:05 -0700, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
2
3 > The problem (or multiple problems) here is that it doesn't say what is
4 > being merged into what (no, its not symmetric), and to compound that it
5 > doesn't just leave this file alone and quit or go on to the next file;
6 > it shows some diff again. What does this new diff mean? I can't make
7 > sense of it without answering my other questions.
8 >
9 > To clarify: I don't think this is simply a usability problem that can be
10 > addressed by using better or more verbose English. I think there is a
11 > "big picture", a concept of what is being done, and this concept has not
12 > found its way into the documentation or the UI itself.
13
14 There are other config managers that handle this differently, if you
15 don't like etc-update try another. I tried a few some years ago and
16 settled on conf-update, others swear by cfg-update. conf-update lets you
17 configure the diff and merge programs it uses but I stuck with the
18 defaults except for using colordiff. Merging is interactive so you can
19 choose whether you accept your old setting or the new default for each
20 change. Like you, I treat my settings as the default and generally only
21 merge in new additions to the config or changed defaults.
22
23
24 --
25 Neil Bothwick
26
27 Microbiology: staph only.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o>