Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Ian Zimmerman <itz@××××××××××××.org>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 02:35:25
Message-Id: 20180618023505.gi2wmq3hvcdkf6cm@matica.foolinux.mooo.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior by Mick
1 On 2018-06-17 18:12, Mick wrote:
2
3 > From the fine manual:
4 >
5 > z Zap (delete) the new config file and continue.
6
7 So what do you do if the merge of this file is too hard and you want to
8 do it another time? The answer seems to be q (quit) or n (next), but
9 _nothing_ in the documentation says this is safe.
10
11 > For files which have a lot of changes, some of which I wish to reject
12 > and some to accept, I tend to use m (for merging). Again from the
13 > fine manual:
14 >
15 > m Interactively merge the current and new config files.
16
17 The problem (or multiple problems) here is that it doesn't say what is
18 being merged into what (no, its not symmetric), and to compound that it
19 doesn't just leave this file alone and quit or go on to the next file;
20 it shows some diff again. What does this new diff mean? I can't make
21 sense of it without answering my other questions.
22
23 To clarify: I don't think this is simply a usability problem that can be
24 addressed by using better or more verbose English. I think there is a
25 "big picture", a concept of what is being done, and this concept has not
26 found its way into the documentation or the UI itself.
27
28 In particular, I suspect the developers think of it as merging my mods
29 into the "official" packaged versions, while I want to handle it the
30 other way: I see my version as the "master" or "trunk", and I want to
31 merge the package mods into it.
32
33 But I really don't know. I am confused :-P
34
35 --
36 Please don't Cc: me privately on mailing lists and Usenet,
37 if you also post the followup to the list or newsgroup.
38 To reply privately _only_ on Usenet and on broken lists
39 which rewrite From, fetch the TXT record for no-use.mooo.com.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>
Re: [gentoo-user] Re: default CONFIG_PROTECT behavior Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>