| 1 |
Am 2010-12-11 00:08, schrieb Neil Bothwick: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 14:47:26 +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> Since / only needs about 200MB, space isn't really an issue, and RAID1 |
| 5 |
>>> gives the highest redundancy. The main reason I don't put / on a |
| 6 |
>>> higher RAID level is that it adds the complication of another |
| 7 |
>>> filesystem and partition on each drive. / + one LVM keeps it nice and |
| 8 |
>>> simple. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> OK, I see your point. My / is usually bigger, it seems that you use |
| 11 |
>> other/more separate partitions/LVs for stuff like /var etc. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Of course. If you're going to use LVM, you may as well put everything on |
| 14 |
> it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Set it up today. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
small RAID1 for boot (6 devices) |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
32 gigs RAID6 for / (right now it's all in there... /var etc ... just to |
| 21 |
keep it simple for the start) |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
the rest (aside from swap) went into a LVM-VG (sorry, folks) |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
I will learn about bind-mounts on my testboxes, for the customer I |
| 26 |
decided to stay with what I know so far. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
And, yes, I took care of chunks, stride, and stripes .... ;-) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
Thanks all .. Stefan |
Archives