1 |
Dale wrote: |
2 |
> P Levine wrote: |
3 |
>> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com |
4 |
>> <mailto:rdalek1967@×××××.com>>wrote: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>> After another round of google searches, startpage |
7 |
>> actually, I found where someone posted that having a slideshow causes |
8 |
>> this. I switched from slideshow to something else and sure |
9 |
>> enough, it |
10 |
>> hasn't hogged up memory, yet anyway. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> So, disable slideshow until this gets fixed and at least you |
13 |
>> don't have |
14 |
>> to worry about it hogging up every last bit of memory. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> |
17 |
>> I vaguely |
18 |
>> |
19 |
>> remember reading that the problem might be related to plasmashell |
20 |
>> loading all available slideshow wallpapers into memory. If you |
21 |
>> really want slideshow, maybe as a possible workaround you can see if |
22 |
>> limiting the number of wallpapers used with slideshow reduces memory |
23 |
>> consumption. |
24 |
>> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> That would be possible I guess. Thing is, I have a lot of wallpapers, |
27 |
> some hi-res large ones that came from NASA at that. If it tried to |
28 |
> load them all, I'd had to have a lot more memory. I think I have over |
29 |
> 20GBs worth of them. Currently I have 16GBs of memory. I'm going to |
30 |
> upgrade one of these days tho. My mobo can handle 32GBs but even |
31 |
> then, I wouldn't want plasmashell to take up that much memory. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> I can test this theory tho. I can pick a small directory and let it |
34 |
> cycle through them. If it is loading them like you read, then it |
35 |
> shouldn't use more than the space the wallpaper files take up. If it |
36 |
> is something else, then it should get real hoggy again. Spellchecker |
37 |
> doesn't like my new word hoggy. lol |
38 |
> |
39 |
> I'm going to test that and see what happens. I'll post the results, |
40 |
> just in case someone runs up on this thread, and on the bug report as |
41 |
> well. |
42 |
> |
43 |
> Thanks for the info. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> Dale |
46 |
> |
47 |
> :-) :-) |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
Well, that didn't take long. I found a directory that was about 1.6GBs |
51 |
of wallpapers. It should not use more than a little over 2GBs of memory |
52 |
even if it loads all the files in memory. Well, it took up right at |
53 |
3GBs in a short period of time. That would put it using well over what |
54 |
it normally uses plus the directory. Usually, it uses about 300MBs at |
55 |
start up. Add to that the 1.6GBs and you end up with about 2GBs or so. |
56 |
Since it was quickly approaching 3GBs, it was well past that. |
57 |
|
58 |
I'm not sure what it is doing but even if it is loading the wallpapers |
59 |
up, it is doing something else in addition to that. |
60 |
|
61 |
I was hoping we were on to something. Oh well. It was worth a try. |
62 |
|
63 |
Thanks. |
64 |
|
65 |
Dale |
66 |
|
67 |
:-) :-) |