1 |
P Levine wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com |
3 |
> <mailto:rdalek1967@×××××.com>>wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> After another round of google searches, startpage |
6 |
> actually, I found where someone posted that having a slideshow causes |
7 |
> this. I switched from slideshow to something else and sure enough, it |
8 |
> hasn't hogged up memory, yet anyway. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> So, disable slideshow until this gets fixed and at least you don't |
11 |
> have |
12 |
> to worry about it hogging up every last bit of memory. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> |
15 |
> I vaguely |
16 |
> |
17 |
> remember reading that the problem might be related to plasmashell |
18 |
> loading all available slideshow wallpapers into memory. If you |
19 |
> really want slideshow, maybe as a possible workaround you can see if |
20 |
> limiting the number of wallpapers used with slideshow reduces memory |
21 |
> consumption. |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
That would be possible I guess. Thing is, I have a lot of wallpapers, |
25 |
some hi-res large ones that came from NASA at that. If it tried to load |
26 |
them all, I'd had to have a lot more memory. I think I have over 20GBs |
27 |
worth of them. Currently I have 16GBs of memory. I'm going to upgrade |
28 |
one of these days tho. My mobo can handle 32GBs but even then, I |
29 |
wouldn't want plasmashell to take up that much memory. |
30 |
|
31 |
I can test this theory tho. I can pick a small directory and let it |
32 |
cycle through them. If it is loading them like you read, then it |
33 |
shouldn't use more than the space the wallpaper files take up. If it is |
34 |
something else, then it should get real hoggy again. Spellchecker |
35 |
doesn't like my new word hoggy. lol |
36 |
|
37 |
I'm going to test that and see what happens. I'll post the results, |
38 |
just in case someone runs up on this thread, and on the bug report as well. |
39 |
|
40 |
Thanks for the info. |
41 |
|
42 |
Dale |
43 |
|
44 |
:-) :-) |