| 1 |
On Sun, Dec 10, 2017 at 9:55 AM, Wols Lists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 09/12/17 12:08, Alan McKinnon wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I'm all in favour of Lennart-bashing, but let's keep the bashing to what |
| 4 |
>> he's responsible for. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> <flame suit on> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> As far as I can tell, the most egregious thing he's responsible for is |
| 9 |
> for wanting a well-designed system that works! |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Face it, linux is a hodge-podge of things thrown together, and held |
| 12 |
> together with baling wire and sealing wax. Lennart doesn't want a system |
| 13 |
> where a small failure in one place cascades and brings down a load of |
| 14 |
> stuff elsewhere. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
<sarcasm> |
| 17 |
And, of course, a system of his doing will not have a single point of |
| 18 |
failure. At all, at all. And it is well-designed, to boot. |
| 19 |
</sarcasm> |
| 20 |
Why not get rid of all the bazaar stuff altogether? They could just |
| 21 |
fork linux. Minus the name, of course. I could suggest a name, but |
| 22 |
won't. But maybe it is more appealing to grab something that is |
| 23 |
already there? Not to mention that it is way more friendly to the |
| 24 |
interests of a certain corporation. |
| 25 |
Regards |
Archives