1 |
On Tuesday 03 February 2009 09:08:31 Paul Hartman wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 10:34 PM, Andrew Gaydenko <a@××××××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> > On Tuesday 03 February 2009 07:15:29 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: |
4 |
> >> > Ups.. He-he... :-) I have thought it is "frame per second" - is |
5 |
> >> > related to "3D reality reconstruction", where GL, *fps* and such are |
6 |
> >> > needed, used, told about. Fine! Probably there are not-FPS :-) beauty |
7 |
> >> > ("rich 3D") games for little boy, are not they? |
8 |
> >> |
9 |
> >> Also, if commercial games are OK for you, I would recommend "World of |
10 |
> >> Goo". It's not 3D, but lots of fun. It has a Linux beta version |
11 |
> >> available. |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > My country isn't included in paypal list, so, I'm going to stick to the |
14 |
> > portage tree :-) |
15 |
> |
16 |
> You probably know them already but tuxracer, frozen-bubble, |
17 |
> neverball/neverputt are fun 3D games for adults or kids and don't have |
18 |
> any violence or killing :) I dunno what is good for a 7-year-old kid |
19 |
> but I think any of those should be easy to learn. lincity is not 3D if |
20 |
> I remember but it's also fun no-violence game. Maybe it's too advanced |
21 |
> for a kid of that age. |
22 |
|
23 |
Paul, |
24 |
|
25 |
Thanks for the list! - will dig in. All the names are new to me as far as I |
26 |
don't play games. |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
Andrew |