1 |
On Sunday, 21 April 2019 03:12:10 BST Dale wrote: |
2 |
> Howdy, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> I'm looking at printers. I been wanting a toner based printer for a |
5 |
> LONG time now. I'm so tired of those poorly made ink jet things that |
6 |
> don't last long at all. I've found one so far. According to the |
7 |
> printer support website, Linux supports it. [1] The site says this: |
8 |
> "Color printer, works Perfectly". Sounds good. This is the model. |
9 |
> Brother HL-L3270CDW |
10 |
|
11 |
I've been running a Brother HL3140CW for the last couple of years. Before |
12 |
that I had a DeskJet 930C. |
13 |
|
14 |
The "works perfectly" claim needs to be caveated. I have been using the net- |
15 |
print/brother-hl3140cw-bin drivers from the brother-overlay. Initially they |
16 |
worked perfectly. However, at some point the installation script changed, I |
17 |
assume to correspond to file ownerships and permissions in some reference |
18 |
distro and consequently some things stopped working in Gentoo without manual |
19 |
editing of config files. There are ebuild fixes kindly submitted by other |
20 |
users: |
21 |
|
22 |
https://github.com/stefan-langenmaier/brother-overlay/pull/53 |
23 |
|
24 |
Nevertheless, the above indicates the statement of "works perfectly" should be |
25 |
taken with a pinch of salt. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
> Now I googled some, which can be dangerous at |
29 |
> times, and not sure this is a printer I want. It seems to be light duty |
30 |
> and I suspect when I first get this thing, I'm going to be printing a |
31 |
> LOT of stuff. According to a spec sheet on the cartridge, it does about |
32 |
> 3,000 pages for black and 2,300 for color. Should I try to find a |
33 |
> printer that does more than this or is that about the norm? |
34 |
|
35 |
There are different spec cartridges, from demo to high volume. The demo/ |
36 |
starter cartridge is only partly filled with toner and will come with your new |
37 |
printer. It will print a third fewer pages than a new cartridge. That said |
38 |
I'm still running the starter cartridges and black shows 50% full after two |
39 |
years of light use. |
40 |
|
41 |
|
42 |
> I did some searching on duty cycles and such. This one shows this: |
43 |
> Duty Cycle: Up to 30,000 Would that be OK for a printer for home use, |
44 |
> likely heavy use the first couple months? What sort of life should I |
45 |
> expect from this type of printer? |
46 |
|
47 |
How long is a piece of string ... ? :) |
48 |
|
49 |
It depends on your particular use case. |
50 |
|
51 |
When a cartridge runs out you replace it. If a drum goes bad, you can replace |
52 |
that too. Hopefully the motor or other parts won't go bad at any time. Since |
53 |
you're not running a shop or a busy office printing hundreds and thousands of |
54 |
pages every day you should see a good life of many many years out of it. |
55 |
|
56 |
|
57 |
> Any insight on this would be nice. As some know, I'm on fixed income |
58 |
|
59 |
A laser printer is *much* more economical to run than inkjets. The toner |
60 |
cartridges never dry out - with inkjet you often replace the ink before it has |
61 |
run out, because it has dried out. Initially you pay more for a laser, but |
62 |
over the years you will recuperate your investment in lower running costs. |
63 |
|
64 |
With the replacement of the laser light source with LEDs the cost of new / |
65 |
laser/ printers has come down, so this makes it an even better choice for most |
66 |
use cases. |
67 |
|
68 |
However, the quality of printing pictures is something you ought to check |
69 |
before you buy. As a rule, inkjets with their liquid ink, print better colour |
70 |
pictures than a comparable laser. Professional laser printers for thousands |
71 |
of dollars are better than what you're thinking of buying, but even then they |
72 |
won't match the colour flow and finish of a good quality inkjet. So, consider |
73 |
your use case and go to a shop to try-before-you-buy, because a laser printer |
74 |
may not be your optimal choice. |
75 |
|
76 |
HTH. |
77 |
-- |
78 |
Regards, |
79 |
Mick |