| 1 |
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006 13:48:17 -0700 Richard Fish <bigfish@××××××××××.org> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
RF> On 7/25/06, Robert Cernansky <hslists2@××××××.sk> wrote: |
| 4 |
RF> > How the developers are informed about packages that should go to |
| 5 |
RF> > stable? Is there posibility for developers to easily find these |
| 6 |
RF> > packages or get some notification about it? |
| 7 |
RF> |
| 8 |
RF> Developers are generally expected to keep track of the packages they |
| 9 |
RF> are maintaining and decide when and if to move them to stable. It is |
| 10 |
RF> possible you are looking at packages that have been orphaned. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Is the list of such packages available somewhere? |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
RF> Regardless, if there are packages you feel are ready to go to stable, |
| 15 |
RF> you can file bugs on bugs.gentoo.org to request stabilization. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Of course I can but I want to point out that this should happen |
| 18 |
occasionally. I reported several packages to be keyworded for amd64 |
| 19 |
year ago and none of them is stable yet. So it seems to me that |
| 20 |
this is not "bug", this is a "rule". |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
PS: Richard, how do you read this mailing list? I have suspicion |
| 23 |
that my mails do not arriving to mailing list. I see only your |
| 24 |
reply, not my original post (this happened also with my previous |
| 25 |
mail from 23. 7.). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Robert |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Robert Cernansky |
| 32 |
E-mail: hslists2@××××××.sk |
| 33 |
Jabber: HS@××××××.sk |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
-- |
| 36 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives