| 1 |
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Kai Krakow <hurikhan77@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Am Tue, 28 Mar 2017 21:19:29 +0100 |
| 3 |
> schrieb Jorge Almeida <jjalmeida@×××××.com>: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I'm using a 400 MBps cable link here, directly connected, I can get 48 |
| 8 |
> MBytes/s out of it (which should be very close if not even little above |
| 9 |
> 400 MBps), even when using the TP-Link as switch. If I use bridge mode |
| 10 |
> and use TP-Link as router, it stop roughly around 300 MBps. My previous |
| 11 |
> router even stopped at 30 MBps. It's a CPU issue. The internal CPU |
| 12 |
> needs to do layer 3 routing. Layer 2 routing (switching) can be done by |
| 13 |
> hardware. Login to your router and see how the CPU is loaded. Use top. |
| 14 |
> If you still loaded it with its original hardware, you cannot do this, |
| 15 |
> tho. Try OpenWRT (that is what I used). |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
You mean, check the % of cpu usage? It must be at about 100%, right? |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I think there's a database which contains throughput test results with |
| 22 |
> different router hardware and different firmware. However, with a quick |
| 23 |
> google search, I cannot find it. You may have more luck. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> [some moments later] |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> I think it's here: |
| 28 |
> https://www.smallnetbuilder.com/tools/charts/router/bar/180-lan-to-wan-tcp/31 |
| 29 |
> |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I think I need wan-to-lan. Anyway, those numbers seem too good to be |
| 32 |
true. 919Mbps with a $61 TP-Link AC1200? What would explain my poor |
| 33 |
results? |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Jorge |
Archives