1 |
reader@×××××××.com wrote: |
2 |
> What are my choices here... is the only one to use the livecd and |
3 |
> emerge portage from there? Or is there such a thing as a sources |
4 |
> package of portage arranged for a stand alone compile job. |
5 |
|
6 |
Portage is written in Python, so no compiling is necessary. It kind of |
7 |
makes me chuckle a bit that emerge -vC portage doesn't at least warn you |
8 |
that this will make a mess of your system (Are you sure?) Hmm, perhaps |
9 |
you need to perform the part of the install stage where you install |
10 |
portage again. I'm not sure what effects this will have with your |
11 |
already installed packages though. Probably first thing you should do |
12 |
is backup your system just in case any further damage occurs. Of |
13 |
course, a fresh install in an option, but that would be a pain... |
14 |
Anyone else want to chime in on how well it would work to just install |
15 |
portage as per the install guide on a system that already has packages |
16 |
on it? Would the new version of portage still be aware of the current |
17 |
world, or would that wipe the world file/other currently installed |
18 |
package data? |
19 |
|
20 |
-- |
21 |
Randy Barlow |
22 |
http://electronsweatshop.com |
23 |
-- |
24 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |