1 |
On Jun 25, 2012 10:55 PM, "Paul Hartman" <paul.hartman+gentoo@×××××.com> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> |
5 |
wrote: |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > And being honest, I hope that something else replaces GRUB2; I like |
9 |
> > the notion of a /firstboot minimal Linux as boot loader, or something |
10 |
> > similar. If the boot loader has to do OS-related work (graphics/input |
11 |
> > drivers and stuff like that), I think using Linux directly is better |
12 |
> > than re-implementing something twice (and probably in the wrong |
13 |
> > manner) as GRUB2 is doing. |
14 |
> |
15 |
> Interestingly, Ubuntu, who has been a big supporter of GRUB2, is |
16 |
> moving away from it because of license incompatibility with UEFI |
17 |
> secure boot. They are going to use efilinux instead and are planning |
18 |
> to extended it to have a simple boot menu interface. |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
Interesting... |
22 |
|
23 |
I wonder if I can use efilinux for Gentoo, too... |
24 |
|
25 |
Rgds, |