| 1 |
thegeezer wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 06/25/2014 08:49 AM, Dale wrote: |
| 3 |
>> thegeezer wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> this is pretty bad. |
| 5 |
>> Here is the output: |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> root@fireball / # smartctl -a /dev/sdc |
| 8 |
>> smartctl 6.1 2013-03-16 r3800 [x86_64-linux-3.14.0-gentoo] (local build) |
| 9 |
>> Copyright (C) 2002-13, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org |
| 10 |
>> |
| 11 |
>> === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === |
| 12 |
>> Model Family: Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 (AF) |
| 13 |
>> Device Model: ST3000DM001-9YN166 |
| 14 |
>> Serial Number: Z1F0PKT5 |
| 15 |
>> LU WWN Device Id: 5 000c50 04d79e15c |
| 16 |
>> Firmware Version: CC4C |
| 17 |
>> User Capacity: 3,000,592,982,016 bytes [3.00 TB] |
| 18 |
>> Sector Sizes: 512 bytes logical, 4096 bytes physical |
| 19 |
>> Rotation Rate: 7200 rpm |
| 20 |
>> Device is: In smartctl database [for details use: -P show] |
| 21 |
>> ATA Version is: ATA8-ACS T13/1699-D revision 4 |
| 22 |
>> SATA Version is: SATA 3.0, 6.0 Gb/s (current: 6.0 Gb/s) |
| 23 |
>> Local Time is: Wed Jun 25 02:46:39 2014 CDT |
| 24 |
>> |
| 25 |
>> ==> WARNING: A firmware update for this drive is available, |
| 26 |
>> see the following Seagate web pages: |
| 27 |
>> http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/207931en |
| 28 |
>> http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/223651en |
| 29 |
> interesting - not seen that before might be worth a nose |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
I was thinking the same thing myself. How does it know there is a |
| 32 |
update was another question I had. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
>> SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. |
| 35 |
>> SMART support is: Enabled |
| 36 |
>> |
| 37 |
>> === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === |
| 38 |
>> SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED |
| 39 |
>> |
| 40 |
>> General SMART Values: |
| 41 |
>> Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity |
| 42 |
>> was never started. |
| 43 |
>> Auto Offline Data Collection: |
| 44 |
>> Disabled. |
| 45 |
>> Self-test execution status: ( 118) The previous self-test completed |
| 46 |
>> having |
| 47 |
>> the read element of the test failed. |
| 48 |
>> Total time to complete Offline |
| 49 |
>> data collection: ( 584) seconds. |
| 50 |
>> Offline data collection |
| 51 |
>> capabilities: (0x73) SMART execute Offline immediate. |
| 52 |
>> Auto Offline data collection |
| 53 |
>> on/off support. |
| 54 |
>> Suspend Offline collection upon new |
| 55 |
>> command. |
| 56 |
>> No Offline surface scan supported. |
| 57 |
>> Self-test supported. |
| 58 |
>> Conveyance Self-test supported. |
| 59 |
>> Selective Self-test supported. |
| 60 |
>> SMART capabilities: (0x0003) Saves SMART data before entering |
| 61 |
>> power-saving mode. |
| 62 |
>> Supports SMART auto save timer. |
| 63 |
>> Error logging capability: (0x01) Error logging supported. |
| 64 |
>> General Purpose Logging supported. |
| 65 |
>> Short self-test routine |
| 66 |
>> recommended polling time: ( 1) minutes. |
| 67 |
>> Extended self-test routine |
| 68 |
>> recommended polling time: ( 340) minutes. |
| 69 |
>> Conveyance self-test routine |
| 70 |
>> recommended polling time: ( 2) minutes. |
| 71 |
>> SCT capabilities: (0x3085) SCT Status supported. |
| 72 |
>> |
| 73 |
>> SMART Attributes Data Structure revision number: 10 |
| 74 |
>> Vendor Specific SMART Attributes with Thresholds: |
| 75 |
>> ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAG VALUE WORST THRESH TYPE |
| 76 |
>> UPDATED WHEN_FAILED RAW_VALUE |
| 77 |
>> 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 119 099 006 Pre-fail |
| 78 |
>> Always - 234421760 |
| 79 |
> you can happily ignore this error rate, it is usual for it to be high |
| 80 |
> and htere is hardware correction for it |
| 81 |
> |
| 82 |
>> 3 Spin_Up_Time 0x0003 092 092 000 Pre-fail |
| 83 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 84 |
>> 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age |
| 85 |
>> Always - 33 |
| 86 |
> 33 power cycles seem very low but further down we see the power on time |
| 87 |
> is just under two years which is also erring towards the lighter side of |
| 88 |
> the mtbf |
| 89 |
|
| 90 |
About the only time I shutdown is when the power fails. My puter only |
| 91 |
pulls about 150 watts so I just leave it running 24/7. |
| 92 |
|
| 93 |
|
| 94 |
> |
| 95 |
>> 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 036 Pre-fail |
| 96 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 97 |
> zero reallocated sectors suggests there is space to do reallocation |
| 98 |
> |
| 99 |
>> 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 079 060 030 Pre-fail |
| 100 |
>> Always - 99909120 |
| 101 |
>> 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 082 082 000 Old_age |
| 102 |
>> Always - 16379 |
| 103 |
> almost two years of power on time |
| 104 |
> |
| 105 |
>> 10 Spin_Retry_Count 0x0013 100 100 097 Pre-fail |
| 106 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 107 |
>> 12 Power_Cycle_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age |
| 108 |
>> Always - 34 |
| 109 |
>> 183 Runtime_Bad_Block 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age |
| 110 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 111 |
>> 184 End-to-End_Error 0x0032 100 100 099 Old_age |
| 112 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 113 |
>> 187 Reported_Uncorrect 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age |
| 114 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 115 |
>> 188 Command_Timeout 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age |
| 116 |
>> Always - 0 0 0 |
| 117 |
>> 189 High_Fly_Writes 0x003a 100 100 000 Old_age |
| 118 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 119 |
>> 190 Airflow_Temperature_Cel 0x0022 069 063 045 Old_age |
| 120 |
>> Always - 31 (Min/Max 26/33) |
| 121 |
>> 191 G-Sense_Error_Rate 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age |
| 122 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 123 |
>> 192 Power-Off_Retract_Count 0x0032 100 100 000 Old_age |
| 124 |
>> Always - 9 |
| 125 |
>> 193 Load_Cycle_Count 0x0032 093 093 000 Old_age |
| 126 |
>> Always - 14284 |
| 127 |
>> 194 Temperature_Celsius 0x0022 031 040 000 Old_age |
| 128 |
>> Always - 31 (0 17 0 0 0) |
| 129 |
>> 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age |
| 130 |
>> Always - 104 |
| 131 |
> 197 |
| 132 |
> this says there are 104 pending sectors i.e. bad blocks on the drive |
| 133 |
> that have not been reallocatd yet |
| 134 |
|
| 135 |
Wonder why it hasn't? Isn't it supposed to do that sort of thing itself? |
| 136 |
|
| 137 |
|
| 138 |
> |
| 139 |
>> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000 Old_age |
| 140 |
>> Offline - 104 |
| 141 |
> this says it was not able to reallocate. which is odd because of the |
| 142 |
> entry 5 being zero |
| 143 |
|
| 144 |
Uh oh. |
| 145 |
|
| 146 |
> |
| 147 |
>> 199 UDMA_CRC_Error_Count 0x003e 200 200 000 Old_age |
| 148 |
>> Always - 0 |
| 149 |
>> 240 Head_Flying_Hours 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age |
| 150 |
>> Offline - 15955h+37m+28.932s |
| 151 |
>> 241 Total_LBAs_Written 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age |
| 152 |
>> Offline - 52221690631887 |
| 153 |
>> 242 Total_LBAs_Read 0x0000 100 253 000 Old_age |
| 154 |
>> Offline - 74848968465606 |
| 155 |
>> |
| 156 |
>> SMART Error Log Version: 1 |
| 157 |
>> No Errors Logged |
| 158 |
>> |
| 159 |
>> SMART Self-test log structure revision number 1 |
| 160 |
>> Num Test_Description Status Remaining |
| 161 |
>> LifeTime(hours) LBA_of_first_error |
| 162 |
>> # 1 Extended offline Completed: read failure 60% |
| 163 |
>> 16365 2905482560 |
| 164 |
>> # 2 Extended offline Completed: read failure 60% |
| 165 |
>> 16352 2905482560 |
| 166 |
>> # 3 Extended offline Completed without error 00% |
| 167 |
>> 8044 - |
| 168 |
>> # 4 Extended offline Completed without error 00% |
| 169 |
>> 3121 - |
| 170 |
>> # 5 Extended offline Completed without error 00% |
| 171 |
>> 1548 - |
| 172 |
>> # 6 Short offline Completed without error 00% |
| 173 |
>> 1141 - |
| 174 |
>> # 7 Extended offline Completed without error 00% |
| 175 |
>> 719 - |
| 176 |
>> # 8 Extended offline Completed without error 00% |
| 177 |
>> 525 - |
| 178 |
>> # 9 Short offline Completed without error 00% |
| 179 |
>> 516 - |
| 180 |
>> #10 Extended offline Completed without error 00% |
| 181 |
>> 18 - |
| 182 |
>> #11 Extended offline Completed without error 00% |
| 183 |
>> 5 - |
| 184 |
>> #12 Short offline Completed without error 00% |
| 185 |
>> 0 - |
| 186 |
>> |
| 187 |
>> SMART Selective self-test log data structure revision number 1 |
| 188 |
>> SPAN MIN_LBA MAX_LBA CURRENT_TEST_STATUS |
| 189 |
>> 1 0 0 Not_testing |
| 190 |
>> 2 0 0 Not_testing |
| 191 |
>> 3 0 0 Not_testing |
| 192 |
>> 4 0 0 Not_testing |
| 193 |
>> 5 0 0 Not_testing |
| 194 |
>> Selective self-test flags (0x0): |
| 195 |
>> After scanning selected spans, do NOT read-scan remainder of disk. |
| 196 |
>> If Selective self-test is pending on power-up, resume after 0 minute delay. |
| 197 |
>> |
| 198 |
>> root@fireball / # |
| 199 |
>> |
| 200 |
>> Does that help shed any light on this situation? If you need more |
| 201 |
>> info, just let me know. Off to newegg. BRB |
| 202 |
>> |
| 203 |
>> Dale |
| 204 |
>> |
| 205 |
>> :-) :-) |
| 206 |
>> |
| 207 |
> 104 bad blocks is not a sign of a happy disk. |
| 208 |
> i would replace urgently |
| 209 |
> |
| 210 |
> also consider running smartd or a smartmonitor plugin for munin as the |
| 211 |
> test log suggests you last ran a test after the first year of usage |
| 212 |
> |
| 213 |
> |
| 214 |
|
| 215 |
I usually just run the test manually but I sort of had family stuff |
| 216 |
going on for the past year, almost a year anyway. Sort of behind on |
| 217 |
things although I have been doing my normal updates. |
| 218 |
|
| 219 |
I ordered a drive. It should be here tomorrow. In the meantime, I |
| 220 |
shutdown and re-seated all the cables, power too. I got the test running |
| 221 |
again but results is a few hours off yet. It did pass the short test |
| 222 |
tho. I'm not sure that it means much. |
| 223 |
|
| 224 |
Thanks much. |
| 225 |
|
| 226 |
Dale |
| 227 |
|
| 228 |
:-) :-) |
Archives