Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: David Haller <gentoo@×××××××.de>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60%
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 00:51:55
Message-Id: 20140626000003.GA27849@grusum.endjinn.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% by Dale
1 Hello,
2
3 On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Dale wrote:
4 >thegeezer wrote:
5 >> On 06/25/2014 08:49 AM, Dale wrote:
6 >>> Device Model: ST3000DM001-9YN166
7
8 I have (had sort of) the same disc, with the same FW.
9
10 >>> see the following Seagate web pages:
11 >>> http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/207931en
12 >>> http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/223651en
13 >> interesting - not seen that before might be worth a nose
14 >
15 >I was thinking the same thing myself. How does it know there is a
16 >update was another question I had.
17
18 Those FW-Updates do _NOT_ apply to FW-Version 9YN166. From what I
19 found, you'd brick the drive. The smartctl DB does not take the
20 FW-version into account, just the model, to display above notice.
21
22 >>> 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 079 060 030 Pre-fail
23 >>> Always - 99909120
24 >>> 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 082 082 000 Old_age
25 >>> Always - 16379
26 >> almost two years of power on time
27
28 looks familiar
29
30 4 Start_Stop_Count 0x0032 100 100 020 Old_age Always
31 915
32 7 Seek_Error_Rate 0x000f 072 060 030 Pre-fail Always
33 19309568
34 9 Power_On_Hours 0x0032 088 088 000 Old_age Always
35 11351
36
37 [..]
38 >>> 197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 100 100 000 Old_age
39 >>> Always - 104
40 >> 197
41 >> this says there are 104 pending sectors i.e. bad blocks on the drive
42 >> that have not been reallocatd yet
43 >
44 >Wonder why it hasn't? Isn't it supposed to do that sort of thing itself?
45
46 >>> 198 Offline_Uncorrectable 0x0010 100 100 000 Old_age
47 >>> Offline - 104
48 >> this says it was not able to reallocate. which is odd because of the
49 >> entry 5 being zero
50 >
51 >Uh oh.
52
53 Yeah. Oh, and I had a "clean" smart until a few days ago, luckily I
54 alread had a WD Red (WD40EFRX) drive waiting when this attrib jumped
55 from 0 to:
56
57 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 087 087 036 Pre-fail Always
58 17688
59
60 Other Seagates (a few 1.5T drives) have also made me trouble, the 2T
61 Samsung already relabeled and sold as a Seagate but with Samsung in
62 the FW though is still ok.
63
64 [..]
65 >I ordered a drive. It should be here tomorrow. In the meantime, I
66 >shutdown and re-seated all the cables, power too. I got the test running
67 >again but results is a few hours off yet. It did pass the short test
68 >tho. I'm not sure that it means much.
69
70 Good. Do not use dd, it WILL fail at the first error. Use gnu ddrescue
71 or dd_rescue to grab an image. I used mc to copy via filesystem, eg.
72 'rsync -auxlPRAXSHD /foo/ /bar/' is fine too. Oh, and I hope you
73 didn't buy a Seagate again ;)
74
75 -dnh
76
77 --
78 The sigmonster ate my sig and all I got was this stupid tagline.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] smartctrl drive error @60% Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>