1 |
David Haller wrote: |
2 |
> Hello, |
3 |
> |
4 |
> On Wed, 25 Jun 2014, Dale wrote: |
5 |
> Yeah. Oh, and I had a "clean" smart until a few days ago, luckily I |
6 |
> alread had a WD Red (WD40EFRX) drive waiting when this attrib jumped |
7 |
> from 0 to: 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 087 087 036 Pre-fail Always |
8 |
> 17688 Other Seagates (a few 1.5T drives) have also made me trouble, |
9 |
> the 2T Samsung already relabeled and sold as a Seagate but with |
10 |
> Samsung in the FW though is still ok. [..] |
11 |
|
12 |
I was wondering about how that would be updated since a lot of that |
13 |
stuff requires windoze. |
14 |
|
15 |
|
16 |
>> I ordered a drive. It should be here tomorrow. In the meantime, I |
17 |
>> shutdown and re-seated all the cables, power too. I got the test running |
18 |
>> again but results is a few hours off yet. It did pass the short test |
19 |
>> tho. I'm not sure that it means much. |
20 |
> Good. Do not use dd, it WILL fail at the first error. Use gnu ddrescue |
21 |
> or dd_rescue to grab an image. I used mc to copy via filesystem, eg. |
22 |
> 'rsync -auxlPRAXSHD /foo/ /bar/' is fine too. Oh, and I hope you |
23 |
> didn't buy a Seagate again ;) |
24 |
> |
25 |
> -dnh |
26 |
> |
27 |
|
28 |
I plan to rsync or cp the data over. The dd part will come into play |
29 |
after I am sure I got everything off that I can get and am just erasing |
30 |
the drive completely. I plan to dd the drive then run the tests again |
31 |
just to see what it is doing. Heck, maybe it will reallocate that area |
32 |
like it should be doing already, I guess. |
33 |
|
34 |
Time will tell. I'll be having fun tomorrow tho. ;-) |
35 |
|
36 |
Dale |
37 |
|
38 |
:-) :-) |