| 1 |
Enrico Weigelt wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Bruno Lustosa <bruno.lists@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> <snip> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> anyway, why use old inetd at all? xinetd is way more powerful and secure! |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> well, I've already been using it for over 10 years, I never had |
| 9 |
> serious problems with it, and has all I need. |
| 10 |
> So why should I now switch to xinetd ? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It's more modern. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
> Wouldn't it make more sense to let "inetd" be an virtual package |
| 15 |
> which can be configured by some useflag to get either classic inetd |
| 16 |
> or xinet in, maybe xinet as default ? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Why? The current way is quite fine, IMO. You can easily select |
| 19 |
which package to install, why depend on some USE flag? |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Alexander Skwar |
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
In Blythe, California, a city ordinance declares that a person must own |
| 24 |
at least two cows before he can wear cowboy boots in public. |
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives