| 1 |
David Relson napisał(a): |
| 2 |
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006 19:06:12 -0500 |
| 3 |
> Michael Crute wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
>> On 11/8/06, Michael Sullivan <michael@××××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>>> I have a small network, consisting of three PCs. Each of these PCs |
| 9 |
>>> has a public WAN address, and each runs Apache, vsftpd and sendmail |
| 10 |
>>> (as well as ipkungfu for firewall protection). One of them runs |
| 11 |
>>> mailman. I would like to replace sendmail with something not |
| 12 |
>>> so...shall we say prehistoric? I've been advised many times to do |
| 13 |
>>> so on this list and others. Would anyone please give me some |
| 14 |
>>> recommendations for a new choice of mail server? I'd like one with |
| 15 |
>>> plenty if documentation. |
| 16 |
>>> |
| 17 |
>> For my money I would say run postfix. |
| 18 |
>> |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> Michael S: |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> I agree with Michael C. I've been running postfix for several years. |
| 23 |
> It's easy to use and it works! More than that I don't want/need |
| 24 |
> (though I do use mailman with it to handle the bogofilter mailing |
| 25 |
> lists). |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
Hi, |
| 28 |
I have few (small) sites that run postfix under my control and I also |
| 29 |
would recommend it. |
| 30 |
However if you require some advanced features from postfix |
| 31 |
(anti-virus, spamassassin etc.) then be prepared for few surprises on |
| 32 |
upgrade and looking through configuration files + documentation + |
| 33 |
changelog. Once it cought me with my pants down and left my sites for |
| 34 |
few days without mail until I found source of the problem. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Still, postfix is the best IMVHO. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Cheers, |
| 39 |
Radek. |
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives