1 |
Hilco Wijbenga wrote: |
2 |
> On 10 September 2010 10:25, Dale<rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Do you have the package listed in the unmask or keyword file? If so, it |
5 |
>> ignores the mask file. Actually, I think it reads mask first then the |
6 |
>> others. |
7 |
>> |
8 |
> Ah! Yes, I do. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> That explains why package.mask is being ignored, I guess, but I can't |
11 |
> think of a way yet to prevent the downgrade. Removing from |
12 |
> package.unmask just creates errors and adding 4.5.1-r1 didn't seem to |
13 |
> have any effect. Any ideas? |
14 |
> |
15 |
> |
16 |
|
17 |
Sounds like some things depend on that version being installed. You may |
18 |
just have to go through them one by one and add them to the appropriate |
19 |
files. I did this a few days ago with qt. It's not fun but I don't |
20 |
know of a better way. |
21 |
|
22 |
You may want to check into autounmask for future use. At least that way |
23 |
you can just remove things that you no longer need, want or want to |
24 |
downgrade for some reason. |
25 |
|
26 |
Dale |
27 |
|
28 |
:-) :-) |