Archives
Archives
| From: | Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@×××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays & package.mask | ||
| Date: | Fri, 10 Sep 2010 19:07:00 | ||
| Message-Id: | AANLkTinuO47Yypojz+fPjmUBoEOLctQ6NjjbQj5W7fLw@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays & package.mask by Dale |
||
| 1 | On 10 September 2010 10:25, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > Do you have the package listed in the unmask or keyword file? If so, it |
| 3 | > ignores the mask file. Actually, I think it reads mask first then the |
| 4 | > others. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | Ah! Yes, I do. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | That explains why package.mask is being ignored, I guess, but I can't |
| 9 | think of a way yet to prevent the downgrade. Removing from |
| 10 | package.unmask just creates errors and adding 4.5.1-r1 didn't seem to |
| 11 | have any effect. Any ideas? |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Overlays & package.mask | Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> |