Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Renat Golubchyk <ragermany@×××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 19:26:30
Message-Id: 20051024212005.463d5d0d@mating-tux.renatik.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0 by "Eric S. Johansson"
1 On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 15:06:26 -0400 "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@××××××.org>
2 wrote:
3 > The problem was /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and /etc/init.d/net.lo were the
4 > same. The net.eth0 code was overwritten with the lo code.
5 >
6 > This happened on two machines and I'm wondering how it happened? Did
7 > something go wrong in the emerge process? There's no sign of any
8 > attackers.
9
10 They are always the same since net.eth0 (and all other net.<interface>)
11 is a symlink to net.lo.
12
13 Cheers,
14 Renat
15
16
17 --
18 Probleme kann man niemals mit derselben Denkweise loesen,
19 durch die sie entstanden sind.
20 (Einstein)

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] curious thing with net.eth0 "Eric S. Johansson" <esj@××××××.org>