1 |
You updated your beta2 with beta3. Now you can add beta2 again by emerge |
2 |
=dev-db/posgresql-9.4-beta2 (or something like) |
3 |
|
4 |
2014-11-10 16:36 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
5 |
|
6 |
> Well, after the emerge, no sign of beta2 anywhere, I have the directory |
7 |
> /usr/lib64/postgresql-9.4/ with the beta3 binaries and that is all, is |
8 |
> there a problem with the ebuilds or something? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> > Well, emerge it again :). You can have two postgresql-servers in |
13 |
> different |
14 |
> > slots. |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > 2014-11-10 16:21 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
17 |
> > |
18 |
> > > However, when I emerge beta3, beta2 is gone, so this is my problem. |
19 |
> > > |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > > Vladimir Romanov <blueboar2@×××××.com> wrote: |
22 |
> > > |
23 |
> > > > Yes. You emerge both beta2 and beta3, then run pg_upgrade for beta3, |
24 |
> > > > provide BOTH binaries to it, it converts the base. Then you can |
25 |
> delete |
26 |
> > > > beta2. |
27 |
> > > > |
28 |
> > > > 2014-11-10 16:04 GMT+05:00 <covici@××××××××××.com>: |
29 |
> > > > |
30 |
> > > > > Hi. I have a puzzle regarding upgrading postgresql. In my recent |
31 |
> > > world |
32 |
> > > > > update I went from 9.4_beta2 to beta3, but when I tried to start |
33 |
> the |
34 |
> > > > > server, it complained that the databases were written with a |
35 |
> different |
36 |
> > > > > "catalog version" -- whatever that is, and the pg_upgrade tool |
37 |
> requires |
38 |
> > > > > both old and new binaries to actually upgrade the database. So as |
39 |
> a |
40 |
> > > > > temporary measure, I went back to beta2 and things worked again. |
41 |
> So |
42 |
> > > > > what the heck are you supposed to do here, I like pg, but this is |
43 |
> very |
44 |
> > > > > strange to me. |
45 |
> > > > > |
46 |
> > > > > Thanks in advance for any suggestions. |
47 |
> > > > > |
48 |
> > > > > -- |
49 |
> > > > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question |
50 |
> is: |
51 |
> > > > > How do |
52 |
> > > > > you spend it? |
53 |
> > > > > |
54 |
> > > > > John Covici |
55 |
> > > > > covici@××××××××××.com |
56 |
> > > > > |
57 |
> > > > > |
58 |
> > > > |
59 |
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
60 |
> > > > Alternatives: |
61 |
> > > > |
62 |
> > > > ---------------------------------------------------- |
63 |
> > > |
64 |
> > > -- |
65 |
> > > Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
66 |
> > > How do |
67 |
> > > you spend it? |
68 |
> > > |
69 |
> > > John Covici |
70 |
> > > covici@××××××××××.com |
71 |
> > > |
72 |
> > > |
73 |
> > |
74 |
> > ---------------------------------------------------- |
75 |
> > Alternatives: |
76 |
> > |
77 |
> > ---------------------------------------------------- |
78 |
> |
79 |
> -- |
80 |
> Your life is like a penny. You're going to lose it. The question is: |
81 |
> How do |
82 |
> you spend it? |
83 |
> |
84 |
> John Covici |
85 |
> covici@××××××××××.com |
86 |
> |
87 |
> |