1 |
On Thursday 02 November 2006 07:41, Iain Buchanan wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, 2006-11-01 at 17:56 -0800, Grant wrote: |
3 |
> > I'm reading now that bluetooth uses the 2.4Ghz band which is just |
4 |
> > about tapped out around here. |
5 |
> |
6 |
> tapped? do you mean people tap into it? It is fairly easy to "tap" |
7 |
> into a bluetooth headset - the standard passwords for simple devices |
8 |
> are usually 0000, 1111, and that sort of thing. |
9 |
|
10 |
I think he means "maxed out". And he apparently doesn't realise how much |
11 |
bandwidth is available around 2.4Ghz: for example between 2.4 and 2.5 |
12 |
there's 5 times more bandwidth than the *entire* FM radio spectrum, or |
13 |
enough space for about 20 TV stations |
14 |
|
15 |
> > My wireless keyboard and wireless |
16 |
> > network use it, and since I'm in an apartment there's no telling |
17 |
> > how many other people are doing the same, along with their |
18 |
> > microwaves and phones. Has anyone used a bluetooth headset in an |
19 |
> > environment with other devices utilizing the 2.4Ghz band? |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I use bluetooth in our office, with 2 802.11 b/g access points, and a |
22 |
> handful of laptops / pda's and I haven't noticed any interference. I |
23 |
> doubt the bandwidth is "throttled" though... |
24 |
|
25 |
Similar around here. With an effective range of about 2m, it will take a |
26 |
lot more than a typical office or apartment building to cause |
27 |
consistent interference over bluetooth |
28 |
|
29 |
alan |
30 |
-- |
31 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |