Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: "Bo Ørsted Andresen" <bo.andresen@××××.dk>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] shared portage tree
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 12:02:19
Message-Id: 200709241347.27461.bo.andresen@zlin.dk
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] shared portage tree by Daniel Iliev
1 On Monday 24 September 2007 13:36:34 Daniel Iliev wrote:
2 > Yes. This setup works here also and I have no breakages, but since I've
3 > let the x86 machies use shared portage tree I have the feeling the
4 > performance of portage dropped down notably.
5 >
6 > I don't know what happens at the end of "emerge --sync", what the
7 > metadata consists of and if it is the same for each arch and
8 > installation. Should I do "emerge --regen" after syncing on each
9 > machine or something like that?
10
11 If anything you should do emerge --metadata. If transfers the metadata/cache
12 to /var/cache/edb. If you never modify eclasses in /usr/portage you can
13 alternatively use the metadata_overlay cache module...
14
15 http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/portage/doc/faq.xml
16
17 --
18 Bo Andresen

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user][SOLVED] shared portage tree Daniel Iliev <danny@××××××××.com>