| 1 |
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon <at> gmail.com> writes: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 17/09/2015 16:09, james wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Huh? You really should stay in the E&M domain, for accuracy and not |
| 6 |
> > confusing the readers. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> I'm not familiar with the term "E&M" |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Aren't you an EE, amongst other talents? |
| 11 |
Electricity and Magnetism (E&M) |
| 12 |
You know, what physicists call Fields and Waves.... |
| 13 |
Surely you've met my friend Schroedinger? |
| 14 |
Electric fields; just for fun [1] |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> For the rest, we seem to have diverged the plot somewhere. |
| 18 |
> We agree. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Hey, I posted once about PS, and everybody had to pile_on (ok). |
| 21 |
The I posted again on a different sub_thread, try to avoid |
| 22 |
conflict. I know power, small signals, DSPs and quite a bit of |
| 23 |
Rf.......... Granted, my people skills, despite arduous effort, |
| 24 |
are weak, at best. That why I sit in a lab alone, and mostly |
| 25 |
contract, when something interests me... |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Cheers! |
| 28 |
;-) |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schrödinger_field |
Archives