Archives
Archives
| From: | Stroller <stroller@××××××××××××××××××.uk> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-user@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-user] Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard? Comparison? What's the difference? | ||
| Date: | Sat, 16 Sep 2017 21:25:26 | ||
| Message-Id: | 5F78B11A-6AB6-4389-A025-E69D05524934@stellar.eclipse.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-user] Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard? Comparison? What's the difference? by Alan McKinnon |
||
| 1 | > On 16 Sep 2017, at 20:31, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > As far as I'm aware (and could be wrong), sshguard is mostly just sshd |
| 4 | > whereas fail2ban works on anything you can give it consistent logs for. |
| 5 | |
| 6 | I thought otherwise, but you appear to be right - SSHGuard appears to have only a handful of "signatures", so it looks like Fail2Ban it is. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | https://www.sshguard.net/docs/reference/attack-signatures/ |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Stroller. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-user] Fail2Ban vs SSHGuard? Comparison? What's the difference? | Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> |