| 1 |
At Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:05:26 +0200 Daniel Pielmeier <daniel.pielmeier@××××××××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> I have tested xrandr but it is useless for me! I tried various things |
| 4 |
> but neither of them seem to have any effect on my secondary screen. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Since you are describing a TV out it might be your tertiary screen. |
| 7 |
When I type xrandr with no arguments I get |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1600 x 1200, maximum 1920 x 1920 |
| 10 |
VGA connected 1600x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right) 0mm x 0mm |
| 11 |
1920x1440 60.0 |
| 12 |
1600x1200 60.0* |
| 13 |
1280x960 60.0 |
| 14 |
LVDS connected (normal left inverted right) |
| 15 |
1680x1050 60.0 + |
| 16 |
1024x768 60.0 |
| 17 |
800x600 60.3 |
| 18 |
640x480 59.9 |
| 19 |
TV disconnected (normal left inverted right) |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
VGA is what I would call the "secondary" (for me it is an external |
| 22 |
monitor, I believe it is always the monitor attached via the VGA or |
| 23 |
DVI output, LVDS is the screen on the |
| 24 |
laptop. Presumably TV is the signal to drive a TV (I never used |
| 25 |
mine). |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
If you type |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
xrandr --output TV --off |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
does it stop driving the TV? That is what the manual suggests will |
| 32 |
happen. If not than it seems the nvidia driver isn't supporting randr |
| 33 |
1.2. Perhaps that was what was meant by "wont fix", nvidia bug. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
allan |
| 36 |
-- |
| 37 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives