| 1 |
> Since you are describing a TV out it might be your tertiary screen. |
| 2 |
> When I type xrandr with no arguments I get |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1600 x 1200, maximum 1920 x 1920 |
| 5 |
> VGA connected 1600x1200+0+0 (normal left inverted right) 0mm x 0mm |
| 6 |
> 1920x1440 60.0 |
| 7 |
> 1600x1200 60.0* |
| 8 |
> 1280x960 60.0 |
| 9 |
> LVDS connected (normal left inverted right) |
| 10 |
> 1680x1050 60.0 + |
| 11 |
> 1024x768 60.0 |
| 12 |
> 800x600 60.3 |
| 13 |
> 640x480 59.9 |
| 14 |
> TV disconnected (normal left inverted right) |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> VGA is what I would call the "secondary" (for me it is an external |
| 17 |
> monitor, I believe it is always the monitor attached via the VGA or |
| 18 |
> DVI output, LVDS is the screen on the |
| 19 |
> laptop. Presumably TV is the signal to drive a TV (I never used |
| 20 |
> mine). |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I don't know wheather the TV is secondary or tertiary, when i type |
| 23 |
xrandr with no options i just get the output of my primary monitor, as |
| 24 |
randr is not supported. I am not exactly sure which output i get as i |
| 25 |
have no access to my box at the moment, but i will check this. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
> If you type |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> xrandr --output TV --off |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> does it stop driving the TV? That is what the manual suggests will |
| 32 |
> happen. If not than it seems the nvidia driver isn't supporting randr |
| 33 |
> 1.2. Perhaps that was what was meant by "wont fix", nvidia bug. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
I guess a fix for this from nvidia will take ages as usually, is |
| 36 |
anybody out there who got tv-out working with the opensource driver |
| 37 |
from xorg with nvidia? Or do we have to wait for nouveau, mabe it does |
| 38 |
a better job! |
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
Regards, |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
Daniel |
| 43 |
-- |
| 44 |
gentoo-user@g.o mailing list |
Archives