Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Jack <ostroffjh@×××××××××××××××××.net>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM checks for chromium
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 19:23:37
Message-Id: BAK5NYEG.377VMOW2.PY4PHZ2Z@Q2MIIGWY.373YRHQS.SLP6QF3X
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM checks for chromium by Neil Bothwick
1 On 2018.12.04 14:13, Neil Bothwick wrote:
2 > On Tue, 04 Dec 2018 13:42:16 -0500, Jack wrote:
3 >
4 >>> Given I've spent more than two days compiling to get nowhere with
5 >>> this, I'm thinking:
6 >> One thing I've done in the past if something failed after a long
7 >> time compiling is to cd to the top build dir (under the Portage tmp
8 >> dir) and just continue the compile (either make or ninja, or
9 >> whatever that package uses) when/if that finishes, you can use
10 >> ebuild to finish the install and qmerge steps. That avoids needing
11 >> to start the compile from the beginning.
12 > You can use ebuild for that too, with the compile option. I've have
13 > the chromium build fail for apparently random reasons on my laptop
14 > from time to time and ebuild ... compile finishes the process.
15
16 Unless I'm mistaken, "ebuild /path/to/ebuild compile" does avoid
17 redoing the unpack, prepare, and configure steps, but it starts the
18 compile from scratch. Manually doing "make" (or whatever) in the
19 appropriate directory avoids repeating those parts of the compile that
20 were successful. If the compile takes two days, that's a significant
21 savings in time.
22
23 Jack

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-user] RAM checks for chromium Mick <michaelkintzios@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-user] RAM checks for chromium Neil Bothwick <neil@××××××××××.uk>