| 1 |
Am Dienstag, 18. Dezember 2012, 23:02:41 schrieb Marc Joliet: |
| 2 |
> Am Tue, 18 Dec 2012 13:34:07 +0000 |
| 3 |
> schrieb Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1ists@××××××××.uk>: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> [...] |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > Going back in time |
| 8 |
> > his claim of pulse audio being good for professional audio was also |
| 9 |
> > completely off the mark. Seperating Gnome and pulse can now cause pro |
| 10 |
> > audio users on binary distro's major headaches too. I pointed one |
| 11 |
> > fellow in the direction of a pro audio on gentoo tutorial rather than |
| 12 |
> > deal with some new problems a little after systemd hit Arch. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Holy cow, did he really? Link, please! I thought pulseaudio was only ever |
| 15 |
> advertised for desktop and some embedded use cases, and that Lennart is |
| 16 |
> perfectly aware of the fundamental differences between JACK and PA and that |
| 17 |
> they target a completely different range of applications [0]. I wouldn't |
| 18 |
> *dream* of using anything other than JACK (with LADISH) for pro-audio work |
| 19 |
> (well, more like "home recording" in my case, but close enough). |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I actually like pulseaudio for desktop use, though. When you start JACK it |
| 22 |
> will kindly get out of the way, so the two aren't necessarily mutually |
| 23 |
> exclusive (actually, you can set it up to automatically set up ports in |
| 24 |
> JACK2 with the jackdbus-detect module, if you want that). After a few years |
| 25 |
> of use I finally ended up requiring one of its more "advanced" features: |
| 26 |
> moving streams between sound cards at runtime. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> [0] http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/when-pa-and-when-not.html |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
remember this? a solution without a problem to solve, making a lot of people's |
| 31 |
lifes harder, dropped onto them by the godlike Lennart P.? |
| 32 |
http://lalists.stanford.edu/lad/2009/06/0218.html |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
#163933 |
Archives