| 1 |
On 2020-07-29, Wols Lists <antlists@××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> ????? I can understand a fee for a static IP4 - they've run out, |
| 4 |
> after all, and people are fighting over them ... |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Don't ISPs get a 2^64 allocation of IP6 *network* addresses? They |
| 7 |
> should just allocate one to your router and that's that! Still, I |
| 8 |
> wouldn't put it past them to charge extra for what should be free. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Pricing isn't based on cost. Pricing is based on what people are |
| 11 |
willing to pay. People are willing to pay extra for a static IPv6 |
| 12 |
address, therefore static IPv6 addresses cost extra. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
-- |
| 15 |
Grant |
Archives