Gentoo Archives: gentoo-user

From: Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2013 20:44:05
Message-Id: 52488FFE.3090306@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: separate / and /usr to require initramfs 2013-11-01 by William Hubbs
1 On 29/09/2013 20:55, William Hubbs wrote:
2 > On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 01:55:49PM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
3 >> On 2013-09-28 6:36 PM, Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@×××××.com> wrote:
4 >>> So this brings us back to the essential technical problem that still
5 >>> needs to be solved on your machines:
6 >>>
7 >>> /usr needs to be available (and not only for BT keyboards) at the
8 >>> earliest possible opportunity - this is a technical constraint. To
9 >>> guarantee that, you need to either merge /usr with /, or use an
10 >>> initramfs to guarantee that /usr is available before anything else
11 >>> happens in userland.
12 >>>
13 >>> It*really* is that simple. If you have a better solution than my last
14 >>> two choices, then I am all ears.
15 >>
16 >> Ok, and if this is all true, I can accept it.
17 >
18 > Alan, this is a very good summary of the issues involved. Everyone on
19 > the list should go and read flameeyes' blog post then this summary.
20
21 Thanks William.
22
23 It really was an off-the cuff description done to answer a user's
24 question. I'm glad to hear it communicated what I intended.
25
26
27
28 >
29 > Tanstaaf,
30 >
31 > I am the OpenRC author/maintainer and a member of base-system. I can
32 > tell you that we are not discussing forcing systemd on everyone in
33 > Gentoo Linux as a default init system. I can also tell you that I am not
34 > aware of the Gentoo systemd team discussing this. Even if they were, a
35 > distro-wide change like this would have to be brought before the
36 > Council.
37 >
38 > William
39 >
40
41
42 --
43 Alan McKinnon
44 alan.mckinnon@×××××.com